Hello! We've had a Tulikivi cookstove (LLU1250) as our primary heat source (and sole cooking source) for 5 years. I have a love-hate relationship with it. It is super efficient (2.5 cords/year for heating and cooking, in Alaska) and once the mass is heated, it makes a nice, steady heat. The bake
oven holds temperature for a long time, which can act like a slow cooker, and cooking on the stove top is super easy. But it has some big down sides:
1) They're expensive! You could buy the nicest, most efficient soapstone
wood stove AND the nicest
wood cook stove and still have plenty of change to spare.
2) They have an issue with creosote. It may be the paper birch that we burn, but even with bone-dry wood, we get creosote build-up in the stove (not chimney). Plus, with all those channels, they're not easy to clean.
3) They take a LONG time to heat up- the thermal inertia that makes for even heating takes a while to build. No building a fire to take the chill off.
4) Though they don't use much wood, it requires much more processing- they need small, stove-wood sized pieces, which means lots and lots of splitting. And because of aforementioned creosote problems, you have to have a really good drying strategy in place.
5) Retrofitting is tough. These things are massive, which needs to be incorporated into foundation planning and which precludes easy modification/replacement.
On the whole-- and though our Tulikivi is the heart of our home-- I wouldn't consider another if we were to relocate.