Hi all,
My wife and I have built a test
RMH in a shed. Didn't have a lot of space so we used 6 inch exhaust pipe about 21 feet long with 2 180 degree turns and one 90 degree turn to exit through a wall. The two 180s were negotiated with one T and one 90 degree elbow each. Used a 55 gallon drum so maybe a mismatch there. We built the
feed tube, burn tunnel, and heat riser with brick. Here are the dimensions and description.
Feed tube opening: 6" x 4.75"
burn tunnel cross section: 6" x 4.75"
burn tunnel length (D): 14"
heat riser cross section: 6" x 6"
heat riser height (E): 41"
The insulation around the heat riser is contained with 1/4" hardware cloth and stuffed with vermiculite and slip mix. It has a flat top at 41". The distance from the heat riser top the the bottom of the barrel top is 2.25". The space between the heat rise sides and the barrel sides varies (didn't get the cloth exactly circular) between 1" and 2". When we fire the stove there is pretty even heat around all the barrel sides.
We've had about 5 or six test fires so far. The first couple were with minimal
cob. Just
enough mortar and cob to seal the barrel and the connection from the barrel to the exhaust pipe. Even then without all the pipe turns in place it seemed to run cool. I could touch my hand near the top of the barrel on the sides momentarily. It was hot to touch but didn't burn.
Since then we laid out all the pipe in the final configuration as described above and covered all with cob so we are sweating out a lot of moisture from the system.
Yesterday I got a bi-metal stove thermometer and dropped it on the top of the barrel and fired it up again. After preheating the primer port and a few smokey minutes the fire draws nicely. The first fire I built was with scrap
wood and very small windfall branches (not the best density or heat content). I focused on using small pieces to get the fastest time to highest heat. After about 40 minutes or so the temperature registered at 420 F. I kept messing with it pushing more wood into the feed tube and subsequently blocking the burn tunnel with hot embers so the draw stalled out and filled the shed with smoke. I pulled all the wood I could grab out and the stove started to draw again. I let it burn down for quite a while. I took a break.
The 2nd fire: I cleaned out all the
ash and embers with a small scoop and some bent sheet metal to reach into the tunnel. This time I used sticks split from our regular supply of cord wood - very dense hedge (Osage orange) - split very small. Again in about 45 minutes I had a good hot fire going and the temperature registered about 450 F. This time I was careful not to push anything into the burn tunnel so it remained relatively clear compared to the first test.
So that's the story - to me - compared to what I have read and seen in videos this is not as hot as I expected. I know that the distance from the top of the heat riser to the top of the barrel is more than ideal for cooking but I didn't think it would be a problem for generating a hot fire. On the other hand this is first time I have ever seen a
rocket stove in person.
This test stove is going to be used to heat a small shop in the winter (if it works properly) and as a learning
experience for a possible retrofit into our existing home.
Is this reasonable performance for a
rocket stove and if it isn't what tweaks, adjustments, redesigns are needed to get it running hotter?
I am using the Ianto Evans/Lesli Jackson's book plus the 6" rocket stove plans from Ernie and Erica.