Hi Wayne, et al,
Sorry, your correct, I kinda rushed right over JV's question in my enthusiasm to see that others have used these communication skill sets and know there great value. As well, in my active time in clinical work we called it "active or focused listening"...I too feel that "therapeutic listening" is a nice addition...and for clinical work would now use the term "focused therapeutic listening." For day to day stuff with students, family, and people in genera,l I will think of it more as just "focused listening," and the benefits it does bring to the exchange.
The question, yes a good one and germane to being more effective communicators...
JV wrote:"How do you use the insights found here?"
Using silence - we called this "planned ignoring" in our clinical practice and it does indeed have impact in a written forum as well.
Accepting - Or "thought acknowledgement" has a huge impact on the reader you are sharing an exchange with...especially on an "information forum" like Permies.
Giving recognition - Very similar to "thought acknowledgement" but a step further into an offered accolade for something on note or importance.
Offering self - This one I have been relatively good at here at Permies, though one must monitor the possibility of offering guidance where now was sought (a flaw of mine that could be improved.)
Giving broad openings - By the nature of this forum and its staff...we do this by the normative culture that is Permies.
Offering general leads - We call this "steering" and it is effective in both education, and clinical work.
Placing the event in time or sequence - Not as common, yet effective to validate the chronological relationship between the topic...lets say timber framing...and how it was used and still is germane today in architecture.
Making observations - Part of the "restating" phraseology that is very useful in education as well as therapy, it lets the listener know you have taken their comment and now are sharing your thoughts about it. One must be careful thought as this has a thin edge that can crumple and also sound dismissive of the OP.
Encouraging description of perceptions - Here we ask for photos and diagrams of there questions, thoughts and concepts...very helpful and useful..
Encouraging comparison - A very good practice as long as it does not sound like asking for citations or "proof" of what they are saying. Asking a reader/poster to compare similarities and differences in their ideas, experiences, or interpersonal relationships is useful in getting to understand there foundational skill sets and knowledge base.
Restating - Employed in the same context and modality as "making observations."
Reflecting - Similar, again, to the above, yet must be performed more delicately as this can be construed as "condescension" if not written well.
Focusing - I do use this very often with posters trying desperately to ask a series of difficult and technical questions and all they really need is a simple of "focus answer" thereby allowing them to colles their own thinking and where they may understand the challenges before them more clearly.
Exploring - Here we can do a great service by taking the topic of the OP into a deeper understanding than they may currently possess, thereby broadening the conversation and the individual readers understanding of the topic.
Seeking clarification and validation - This is very similar to "encouraging descriptions of perception." This is the next level of that, usually deeper into the conversation within a OP topic. understanding
Presenting reality - Very crucial, yet one to tread lightly with. Many OP do not believe they possess "misconceptions" and when a perceived "authority figure" attempts this "presenting reality" can aggravate certain personality types...as we all know too well. It is still important to do this often as we do not want to allow other less demonstrative readers believe a "misconception" is a "reality" in general...it just may be the conclusion that one person has, not a contextual reality in the body of the works or topic.
Voicing doubt - Almost a verbatim response in its application to what we do (or
should do) with "presenting reality." Each of us have different "realities" and "doubts."
Verbalizing the implied - We called this in clinical work "restating" and it is a deep and broad modality of communication that could entail many different levels of use. Here I will often restate the "implied" question or comment, in a clearer context.
Attempting to translate words into feelings - Very useful by taking the OP question, or comment and (when applicable) putting into language that is either clearer or less charged with emotion. Some topics move from the technical cognitive abilities of an OP or reader and into emotional reactions to the topic of discussion. Being able to facilitate a conversation from an emotional state into a cognitive one within the reader or OP allows (when it can actually happen) the chance for perhaps a paradigm shift in their thinking.
Formulating plan of action - In clinical work, this too had many levels fro "active planning" to "coping skill sets listing" and many more. Here we use it, again, to colaless a reader or OP's concepts into a viable and executable plan...
Wayne Stephen wrote:This is where we lose apples and marbles :
Before I ramble on into this list, and its pit falls, I should ask if what I just wrote was of any value to the current readers...?
"Non-Therapeutic Communication Techniques :
Giving reassurance - may discourage client from further expression of feelings if client believes the feelings will only be downplayed or ridiculed
Rejecting - refusing to consider client’s ideas or behavior
Approving or disapproving - implies that the nurse has the right to pass judgment on the “goodness” or “badness” of client’s behavior
Agreeing or disagreeing - implies that the nurse has the right to pass judgment on whether client’s ideas or opinions are “right” or “wrong”
Giving advice - implies that the nurse knows what is best for client and that client is incapable of any self-direction
Probing - pushing for answers to issues the client does not wish to discuss causes client to feel used and valued only for what is shared with the nurse
Defending - to defend what client has criticized implies that client has no right to express ideas, opinions, or feelings
Requesting an explanation - asking “why” implies that client must defend his or her behavior or feelings
Indicating the existence of an external source of power - encourages client to project blame for his or her thoughts or behaviors on others
Belittling feelings expressed - causes client to feel insignificant or unimportant
Making stereotyped comments, clichés, and trite expressions - these are meaningless in a nurse-client relationship
Using denial - blocks discussion with client and avoids helping client identify and explore areas of difficulty
Interpreting - results in the therapist’s telling client the meaning of his or her experience
Introducing an unrelated topic - causes the nurse to take over the direction of the discussion"
Regards,
j