Hi Rhys...
That was an excellent suggestion and perfect segue into some aspects of what many are
"trying" to achieve with natural materials...
This forum, and many of us on here, be it DIYer first timer-backyard experimenter, or
experience natural builder, all seem to fall within a spectrum of understanding and/or application:
>>>
"Traditional Natural" (TN)
These architectural modalities are at minimum hundreds of years old and in most archetypes...thousands. Earth, stone, textile, or timber, these methods have an empirical understanding usually rooted in indigenous vernacular forms suited to specific regions or biome types. The actual methods of construction are either still known today by some "knowledge holders" or are documented and studied thoroughly enough to extrapolate over 95% of the original intent of the orgin creators. In these vernacular forms the means, methods and materials (MMM) are employed in a well understood context of application, as reflected by history for the elemental and structural proper use and implementation of a given design matrix.
"New Age Natural" (NAN)
These are the current "reinvented" or "experimental" concepts of what natural materials may be able to achieve, while they are usually augmented with elements of modernity. Most, if not all of these, are extrapolations or alternate applications for most if not all of the MMM found in TN building systems. With few exception, most can be found rooted in history of vernacular architecture and building systems. These contemporary methods are only in the "testing," or "I think it will work this way," stages of development, as are most reinterpretation, experiments, and reinventions of any pre-existing modality.
<<<
Another way of examining this is the difference between
"permanent" and
"transient" types of architectural opus in context to MMM. TN construction methods can be relied upon (within reason of proper application and maintenance) to last a very long time, while the NAN systems could be construed, or have clearly reflected being of a transient nature, and probably not best practice for dependable mainstream residency or reliability. As such, any time we take a TN method and reinterpret its orgin application/use we are facilitating a NAN method and risk the inherent pitfalls with in.
Thanks Rhys and Amedean for helping me get that thought coalesced and out of my head...
It actually belongs in
Reasons to change or not change Natural Building Systems so I shall post it there as well...thanks again for stimulating this connection.
Regards,
j