Wes Hunter wrote:The following comes from someone who just bought two pups himself, for what it's worth.
We raise upwards of 1000 birds per year, processed as table poultry. It's a large part of our income. This year, we lost a lot of birds to predators, primarily coyotes. Part of this is due to inadequate fencing. I'll be upgrading some fencing this winter, but making each field coyote-proof is not going to happen, because of the layout of our farm and because I just don't want that much fence subdivision. Perhaps long-term, a thick hedge in places would work, but that's another topic. Part of it is due to shelter upgrades that need to be made. But the largest part of it is due to the oft-observed fact that pastured poultry producers tend to see a dramatic increase in predation after a couple years as the local predator population figures things out.
We also just recently purchased four ewe lambs and one ram, the beginning of a breeding flock. That really precipitated the dog purchase.
But the dogs cost us $50 each, for 6-month old, partially trained, Pyrenees-cross pups.
By comparison, we lost somewhere around 200 (!) meat chickens this year. That's what happens when they roam freely, and when they prefer the brushy, shaded, insect-and-worm-rich area behind the pond. (Or, more specifically, when ol' Coyote learns they prefer it.) At a projected net of $8 each, that's $1600 in lost potential profits, not to mention the cash we had in them up to the point of their deaths. Then there are the killed guineas, turkeys, ducks, geese, and laying hens. And the now potential for sheep and lambs.
Then, we process birds regularly from about mid-April through December, pigs in January, deer in November, and other game throughout the year. That's a lot of offal, which can greatly reduce feeding expenses.
So, expenses for a couple dogs could easily be offset by reduced losses.
With the amount of livestock you have, however, keeping and feeding two big dogs does not sound like an economically reasonable decision, if one looks at cold numbers. The goats could perhaps be housed in a portable shelter, such as four cattle panels wired together (maybe on PVC skids). That's what we're currently doing with out sheep. Or forego the skids, cut the panels in half, attach stakes to the ends, and you've got a mobile and flexible hurdle system, and your goats are safe for one up-front cost of maybe $100.
Pigs... they should be fine without the help of guard dogs.
And as for poultry, what is the value there? You're spending hundreds of dollars on dogs to protect what I'd think is a poultry collection valued at a fraction of that.
If you want dogs because you like dogs, then by all means get dogs. But if you want dogs solely for the protection they offer, I'd take a long hard look at the numbers to determine if it'll benefit you financially, or if you're just adding that much more to your expenses.
On another note, concerning acquiring economical meat, I'd suggest being on the lookout for (freshly) roadkilled deer, and ask your local friends to do the same. They're especially plentiful this time of year, as breeding activity and animal movement start to increase.
Travis Johnson wrote:I might rethink getting the dogs at all.
I have a Great Pyrenees now, but only because it came from a sheep farm that was selling out of sheep and the dog was $50. For 9 years I raised sheep commercially without an issue. While I understand people want to get a dog just to get a dog, doing so for so few livestock animals just does not make a lot of sense. There are a lot of factors that go into predadation, but a lot of it has to do with size of the herd/flock being protected, and location.
For instance, two goats are not going to raise much smell as to attract coyotes, and predators like to work along large bodies of water. If a farm is away from that, small and has fences good enough to keep goats in, that is probably all they need. In my opinion it is kind of silly to buy (2) $700 dogs to help guard $300 worth of livestock.
Instead...and because predators like coyotes are opportunistic, and relatively small in size, use other deterrents that are far more productive to a farm. I have used cows for instance to "guard" my sheep, their large size being intimidating to coyotes. And when they got older they went in the freezer instead of a dog that nets little in return. If a farm is too small to support a larger animal like a cow, don't get anything to protect the goats because such a small area will not take much to install good fencing.
Farming can be a very vicious cycle, a farm getting livestock, dogs to protect livestock, then rabbits and chicken to feed livestock...etc. The problem with all that is, after awhile the farmers realize they are doing an awful lot of work that is not all that productive for the family. As Paul Wheaton himself advocates, doing earth work around the farm first is paramount. In my opinion, that is far more important and more productive then caring for animals (bunnies) that feed animals (dogs) that care for the original animals (goats).
....
Aside from that though, my Great Pyrenees eats a lot. Maybe it is just her, maybe because she is active and 5 years old, but she eats a lot of food. Rabbits cannot fully supply that though because they are too lean. Because of a lack of fat the dog would eat and eat on rabbit, feel full, but would eventually die due to a lack of nutrition. I have no idea what an ideal of rabbit to other feed sources would be, but a strong rabbit diet would kill a dog. Because you mention getting goats, this phenomenon can also happen with lambs and kids if given the wrong food stuffs; it is called Rumen Pack. It occurs with high moisture diets.