Trace
I'm not a moderator so not sure where they might stand. But I'll risk a dirt practical comment. A PC guy is not me. But I try to communicate effectively and do OK (mostly). IOW, I suspect I'm moderately good at this stuff and make fewer accidental errors(!) than I used to.
Online text communication, especially in a social forum setting where the whole idea is to keep everybody coming back and more or less happy - this is not your casual face to face where you can riff and let your own personal style hang loud. FWIW, I don't see any problem with your post. Except that it doesn't hue the neutral formal overtly courteous line that seems to be the thing that keeps everybody in an online setting calm. Not just here, but pretty much all "civilized" online venues. Your post was casual, direct and personal (and accurate with good info and friendly reference to the other's prior posts). It was a good line. What can I say. But this is a very particular society lacking any face to face perspective and often any long term context on another person's feelings and attitude. In this setting you might want to consider if it makes sense to establish a few filters to keep your delivery in the "nice young boyscout" category unless you have a history of prior good interaction with a particular person.
I got kicked off (or rather, I got on my high horse and refused to compromise) the gardenweb site 15 years ago, about. At the time I was talking about black
water plumbing and "spoke" in venacular (not targeting anybody). The problem didn't bother me much, though I felt somewhat righteous. The guy (it was one person using the royal "We" for all interactions) owning the site was w/out doubt (in my mind, anyway!) a little nazi martinet. However: The site was a major success and still is. It had and has extensive and good information on home and domestic matters of all sorts - it's a go-to site. The enforced bland white bread interactions didn't and don't stand in the way of good info exchange. I believe to this day that a large part of their success was the nicey nicey white picket
fence law of the
land that pleased the "nice ladies" that made of a large portion (maybe 50%?) of the membership. The original owner sold it for a few million a year or so after I was banned and now Hauze picked it up a couple years ago. It's still a good source.
That little explication was in aid of saying the playing field of successful online forums comes with basic limitations. They can and do get stretched, but the formal and overly, even redundantly, polite interaction seems to have a good track record. In my
experience and opinion it doesn't get in the way of quality exchange of ideas. It also varies depending on membership and who is in the conversation.
In any conversation, it's easily possible to "move beyond" that bland genre communication, but one has to do it deftly with thought for the other participants.
Cheers,
Rufus