Join me, and let’s think together. Like really
think about
gardening, perhaps in a new way we’re not used to. I’ve been
gardening for 25 years or so now, and I, like most others I imagine, believe that our fruits, herbs and vegetables ought to be the only thing growing in a garden, and other things that we think don’t belong are weeds, and a lot of labor goes into removing and preventing weeds. Techniques as simple as using ones hands to pull weeds and grasses, to using deep mulch, to smothering with things like
cardboard and mulch, etc. are regularly used. But where does this idea come from? I’m not sure really. It seems to me that at some point in history gardeners decided that only the fruits, herbs, and vegetables that they lovingly tend are the only plants that belong in a garden, and all others are removed. But why? Is it for appearance? I get it, I like things to be neat and tidy. But if we look at nature for examples, many different plants of many different species grow happily right next to each other, sharing the minerals and
water, and all survive and even thrive. There is beauty in the whole complexity.
So, what if we don’t remove weeds. Will food stuffs still grow in a garden? I think so. Might it appear chaotic? Maybe, depends on who is asked I suppose. Could it be more difficult to harvest? Likely yes I think. Will the “weeds” hog all the soil minerals? Doubtful, I think, as the mineral needs of growing plants are minuscule. Competition for sunlight? Ok, I get that, and wouldn’t want tropicals towering over my garden shading everything, but for the scope of this discussion, let’s stick with things that generally stay low to the ground, perhaps under 3 feet tall. Could they drink all the water? Well, I believe there’s too many variables at play here, from the soil types, it’s organic matter content and water holding capacity, the amount of rain or irrigation a garden gets, and whether or not it’s mulched to slow soil moisture loss through evaporation and prevent the soil from baking dry in direct sunlight. So, can we grow abundant gardens right alongside the undesired plants we’ve been removing for years? I think so.
These musings stem from my recent observation of my weedy garden. I
should note this garden is a first year garden in some poor soil that I’m in the process of improving through biomass like
wood chips and regular applications of
compost teas for example. I have grasses thriving in my garden, the spreading kind like bermuda grass, some foxtail grass, some johnson grass, etc. There are other volunteers like nightshade, curly dock,
locust tree seedlings, virginia buttonweed, among others. At first, I steadily removed grasses and
volunteer sprouts that I didn’t plant. Then farm life got busy this summer and I watched the grasses and other forms of plant life get settled and comfortable in my garden. Now in September as the warm season is closing and the days get shorter, I had this thought: Why can’t I just let the grasses and other things grow alongside my veggies? Well, I can, but are there unforeseen impacts that have not just a negative affect on my vegetables and herbs, but a downright detrimental affect? Could the competition possibly have some unknown positive impact on my veggies, such as having a response to grow a little taller and bigger to outcompete the grasses and other growths? Could they establish some mutual, shared connection that is beneficial for each plant through
roots in the soil via a network of mycorrhizal fungi? I grew some great watermelons and muskmelons, some fair tomatoes, cucumbers, and peppers. All my
root crops did poorly, with the potatoes and onions even dying out, which I believe has more to do with the soil than neighboring plants. One thing I have learned in reading
books on soil life is nature uses diversity in plant life to remediate soils, and not just for healing soils but the plant diversity is everywhere in healthy soils as well. The more different things growing means the more roots growing to different layers of the soil, which in turn also means more and different kinds of root exudates and sugars being delivered into the soil to
feed, nurture and establish relationships with soil microbial life which then grow in population and in turn build healthier soil and grow healthier plants and
trees.
I’m now thinking that the primary reason I was removing “weeds” is appearance. Most of us have all grown up seeing beautiful, orderly, weed free gardens in pictures, on tv, and now the internet. Our minds, I think, have been domesticated to think that this is the way it’s done. Most of us see it in real life regularly as well such as office buildings, gas stations and shopping centers for example, where they often have neat and tidy landscaping free of volunteer plants. The “weed freeness” culture appears to be everywhere. My wife and I keep our house neat and tidy, everything in its place, and I appreciate, understand, and in this case,
need cleanliness and order. But when I observe nature, how it works, how it abhors a vacuum and where neat rows and monocultures don’t exist, it got me thinking. A weed free garden certainly may look nice, but is it necessary? Do any permies grow a “survival of the fittest” or chaos type garden?