posted 13 years ago
I don't see any reason that you couldn't grow all of those. The walnuts might take some planning, as they exude a toxin from their roots that kills other plants, though there are plenty ones that aren't affected.
Probably your soil is acid from mono-cropping pine on it, but if you can get ahold of a test kit and test the individual spots you want to plant trees in, it would be best because sometimes small differences can make a big difference in which trees will thrive or fail in a spot. I doubt the soil is poor from the pines, actually, but possibly from the management of them. In natural pine forests they often grow in poor soil and enrich it with their 'litter' over the years.
I agree that swales of some sort would be useful to you in holding moisture for your trees to grow with. When they are mature, they should help draw moisture to the spot from passing weather, and will also recycle the moisture quite efficiently. Open spacing is also a very good idea, especially for your canopy layer of trees. I don't know if you've ever walked through natural forests or not, but they are rather different than orchards or tree farms. Mature forests have open spacing and glens/small meadows here and there. Second growth/immature forests have trees packed very close together, trees that are spindly and obviously not as healthy as the younger trees in a mature forest. Too close together, and too much competition. Eventually, many of the trees in second growth forests die off or are cut out for the health of the forest. Forests are a communal organism, and work much better with larger variety. The nature of your acreage might limit you in some ways, but it can also give you more creative opportunities.
Also, a healthy forest, without a lot of dead wood and dry underbrush is MUCH more fireproof than a forest with crowded trees and too much mast (dead plant matter on the ground). Nature controls fire risks by having small forest fires that clear the mast, which burns quickly, and leaves the bigger plants basically untouched. Some trees are more resistant than others to begin with, too, so you might look into that aspect. (I assume that the eucalyptus aren't yours?)
As for groundcovers, I would look around in your area and observe what does well.
Once you get your trees up to a reasonable height and your vines fairly mature, I don't see why you couldn't start introducing smaller livestock, such as chickens or quail. Long, thin areas tend to be less suited for larger livestock, which might also eat your vines. Some things will move in on their own over time, of course. You certainly DON'T want to introduce livestock that will damage your relatively fragile emerging ecosystem. Goats and sheep, and other large livestock can be detrimental, stripping young plants and keeping the ground too clear, causing erosion and moisture loss. It depends, of course, on how rich the forest is and how deep, how much wildlife/stock animals it can support.
I wish I could give you better advice, but my climate is rather different than yours. Where I grew up sounds a bit closer, but neither is quite the same, and that can make a huge difference in what you choose to grow and which livestock you can imput without harm into your emerging ecosystem.