I'm part of a
local gardening group on
facebook (don't even get me started on this, it's really a festering pit of regurgitated "conventional wisdom" with a healthy dose of self-appointed experts telling everyone they're doing it wrong, but it's a good way to find out about local seed swaps and stuff), and one of the topics that seems to pop up again and again, nearly on a weekly basis, is some form of
"Hey guys, what is this volunteer squash? OMG You MUST pull it out RIGHT NOW did you know that volunteer squash can be TOXIC""Can I save seeds from my squash? OMG NO, the result will be TOXIC!!!""Hey guys, OMG I heard that any squash you don't grow from a seed you buy from a reputable source could be TOXIC"
Now, I'm not trying to say that no squash will ever turn out bitter and toxic. And I'm not even trying to refute the fact that commercial squash seed is saved with a lot better isolation practices than anything that I save or which volunteers in my garden, and is therefore probably a lot less likely to have the toxic bitter genes.
But I've been saving squash seed on a small scale for a while (I dunno, 6 or 8 years maybe), and, while I often get funny surprises caused by the outbreeding habits of squash or from saving seeds from some unstable hybrid, I can't say that I've ever come across a squash with the toxic bitter gene. I'm wondering what is actually the mechanism by which squash acquires the toxic bitter gene. Clearly it isn't coming from everyone else's garden where the commercially-available squash seeds are growing. I've read vague things about squash crossing with some wild squash-relative or a manroot or something like that, and that is how you end up with toxic bitter squash, but how prevalent are these bitter-carrying squash-crossing-plants? Does their prevalence vary across different regions and types of urban/rural environments? Have I just been especially lucky that I've saved thousands of squash seeds and grown out at least hundreds of them over the years, and ended up with none that are bitter (I live in a pretty urban area, so if these bitter squash-relatives live only in rural areas, maybe that has kept this from occurring)?
The frequency with which this toxic bitter squash topic comes up in this local
gardening group and the fervor with which local gardeners insist that no one can save squash seed or allow volunteer squashes to live confuses me, since I have never had the bitter toxic squash happen, or even met anyone who has had it happen. So, I'm wondering if this is something that, while technically a true possibility, is fairly unlikely, but is played up to instill fear in small-scale gardeners and keep them coming back to buy squash seed year after year. It feels like it may be in a similar vein to the much-repeated oversimplifications discouraging saving seeds (e.g. "you can't save seeds from hybrids" or "you have to isolate your plants by 1/2 mile if you are going to save seeds or WHO KNOWS what you may get"), which as far as I can tell only serve to build a sense of rigidity in the practice of growing plants, while discouraging small-scale backyard seed-savers. I don't know if there's actually any diabolical conspiracy perpetrated by seed companies or "big agriculture" with the explicit goal of discouraging seed saving, or if gardeners just like to repeat as absolute truth oversimplifications that may contain some shred of fact, but I'd like to find out more about the mechanism by which the squash bitter toxic gene contaminates regular squash, and find out just how risky or overblown this actually is.