It's been over a month since plans were made to fix the bench. Yesterday, I spoke with a lady who was heavily involved with both projects and who donated many hours of labour when promised volunteer labour was insufficient to finish the eroded one. It turns out that both benches were community projects using mostly volunteer labour and not
profit driven workshops. So the disparity between these two projects is mostly because of what has happened since their creation. Contrary to what I had been told, there was never a plan for the builders to maintain the bench. That job was left to the owners and the agency that originally funded construction. This is why I like private ownership and responsibility. If the bench were mine, I would have built a roof over it --- case closed. In order to get a roof over this one, we'd need a committee and the
city to agree upon it, followed by a fund raiser. Here we have an example of the tragedy of the commons and how bureaucracy can complicate any task.
Now, close your eyes and imagine me ranting on for an hour and a half about how each man is an island, government be damned ... bla bla bla ....
The poorly maintained bench was largely forgotten about by the agency who funded it. This is consistent with what I've witnessed with the garden shed project only a block away, built by the same group. The nicely maintained bench is still maintained by the original builders. It's in their neighbourhood and the community centre pays for supplies. After it became clear that the eroded bench was not valued to the same degree in the neighbourhood where it resides and that the agency who funded it had no interest in maintaining it, the builders, having done their part, left it to the owners.
I suppose I'll find out soon, whether or not volunteers can be raised. Ernie prescribed several coats of thin lime wash to stiffen up the weakened cob. Lime is easier to spread if prepared months in advance. I will get the owners to buy all materials soon and get them to post notices for volunteers with my phone number as the contact, so I can be sure that people do in fact want to get involved. The promised rain cover has not materialized, so I'm cautiously optimistic.
The moral of the story. Cob requires a roof if it is to survive in a rainy climate. I remember reading that one county in southern England has over 40,000 cob homes, most of them over 200 years old. A Google search, failed to turn up cob benches exposed to the elements in that area.