Seems to me that Eddie Huang didn't get the point of his participation in the TED Fellows program. It is clearly explained on
the TED website that the whole point is to have an immersive
experience with the other fellows, be exposed to ideas and people you would otherwise never come in contact with, and hopefully develop of lifelong network of contacts. Yes, Eddie, you were chosen because you have something interesting to offer, but those other folks also have something to offer you. Show a minimum of grace and just hang with them for the time you committed to when you accepted the fellowship that pays all your expenses for the week, including travel. The website clearly states that the fellows have the following responsibilities:
Responsibilities of Fellows
Full attendance and participation at the Conference
Submission of a post-conference report
Regular participation in the TED Fellows community
Cutting out for a day is not "full attendance and participation".
In a former life, I went to plenty of week-long national and international scientific meetings, expenses paid by my university or a research grant. No one made the attendees stay, but it was simply stupid to go and not take full advantage of the situation to learn as much as you possibly could, get to know people in your own and related fields, and attend fascinating talks by the big names or the up-and-coming geniuses. Even eating bad cafeteria food and dancing the macarena with a bunch of brilliant but inebriated folks was part of that networking experience and made for some memorable moments. And yes, as a 30+ PhD candidate, I often slept in dorm rooms with strangers who became friends over the course of the conference.
From my perspective, Eddie Huang comes off as an egotistical snob. "It's my birthday." "I have a podcast to record." "The Hyatt Regency is a dump." "The restaurants around there suck." Get off it, Eddie. You sound like a whiny teenager.