So I was looking for some bit of info, and I came across a comment by Dave Jacke on how "polyculture" and "guild" are not necessarily the same thing.
While I'm new to this, from my studying, I'd been thinking much the same thing, but then.... Dave's explanation of the difference left me confused.
Specifically, the quote was: "a guild is not necessarily a
polyculture, but all effective polycultures
should be composed of multiple guilds."
This seems somewhat backwards from how I understand guilds and polycultures, but I say that as a very new student of
permaculture.
What I've taken from my reading on this:
"Polyculture"--Well, "poly" (many) and "culture" (cultivation/growing). So strictly speaking (and I've a bad habit of being a nitpicker about specificity), polyculture would simply mean growing more than one thing in the same space (as compared to monocultures).
"Guilds"--On the other hand, we have these. My introductory info to guilds was probably a typical one, the "Three Sisters." Here, it's a polyculture, multiple crops in one space. The difference is that the individual crops are also helping the *other* crops. (Corn supports the beans, beans fix nitrogen, etc....)
From that understanding, I would have said "a polyculture is not necessarily a guild, but a guild should be composed of polycultures." Or something along those lines.
So, for Dave, or anyone else who can chime in: What am I getting wrong here?
Am I just nitpicking about the "technical" definition of polyculture? Am I misunderstanding guilds?
Anyway, so there's my question/confusion.
And I've been reading here for a little while, registered in the last week or so, but this is my first post.
So, uh, to everyone.....
Hi.
--
James