David Livingston wrote:
Please could you explain your statement as I am unsure what you mean .
I think what he meant was that since there are more female caretakers then even if the abuse was 50/50 by sex, more women would have abused in percentage terms.
I had to cut my post short because the cows were mooing for food. So it occurred to me,
99% of farm animal abuse is probably committed by farmers. I mean, yeah, the odd non-farmer will occasionally tip over a cow, I guess. But someone might use that stat to tarnish all farmers.
That one stat about "most child abuse is from women" is certainly plucked out of context. The interesting thing about the 2012 data is the conclusion - there was less abuse in 2012 then in the four prior years. I don't particularly believe it but I do wonder if there was an under tone of partisan snipping going on. I don't particularly have a dog in that race, but that's what it seems like.