sgbotsford wrote:
People who breed dogs for money run 'puppy mills'
That is a bit of an oversimplification, I think. I agree that the AKC and such organizations has in some cases had a hugely detrimental effect on some breeds, certainly both the Cocker Spaniel and Collie come to mind, but there are lots of responsible breeders out there. The point perhaps is to find breeders who have done with their dogs what you want to do with yours. I tend to agree that working dogs
should get extra points for demonstrating they can do what the breed was originally used to do, and many many breeders now do campaign their dogs in various working trials as well as the conformation show ring. However, some people are not active for one reason or another, and so an affectionate little dog which doesn't require a mile of walking twice a day and which just brings pleasure to the owner whenever they look at it suits other people.
If it wasn't for the AKC and such organizations many breeds would now be extinct, actually. The Bouvier was certainly close to it after WW2 as they were not widely known and many of them were killed off doing war work. They are marvellous dogs which rapidly gained supporters when people found out about them. Mostly the Bouvier breeders have been responsible and most of them seem actively to pursue working titles in drafting, herding, tracking or police work (some all of them!) as well as conformation titles for their dogs.
I LIKE that there are different breeds with different characteristics. I like that I can get something that is supposed to be a great Pyr and be fairly sure that with appropriate training it will behave as a Pyr should and not like a bloodhound. Bloodhounds are great dogs but not much use for the same things as a Pyr. If I want a dog with the characteristics of a Basset hound, I'm not going to be happy with one that behaves like a Jack Russell terrier. If I want the dog to help me hunt grouse, then a Springer Spaniel is likely to be a happier choice than a Doberman. If I am very active but live in an isolated area with drug dealers around, then a Belgian Malinois may well be a better fit for me than a Borzoi. The AKC and other organisations provides a reason and status to keeping these things sorted out.
One woman actively breeds dogs which she has campaigned extremely successfully internationally in Agility. She has a waiting list of buyers for pups. Her dogs are definitely registered, whether they have championships in the show ring ? - I think they do, but not sure. . They also travel with her as she is involved with a "show" which is put on at various fairs around the country which is just celebrating dogs..purebred or not.
The point is not that "people who breed dogs for money run puppy mills" nor that AKC and such organizations ruin dogs. It's that people all too frequently buy animals for the wrong reasons and without having a clue what they should be doing with them or how to train them. Even, sometimes, how big they will get to be. I once got a shepherd collie cross from a
shelter which had been given up because they didn't think it would get that big and it wasn't even a big dog!.
I think that the person who gets a mutt puppy, never really trains or does a thing with the dog but feed it and clean up after it, then raises a litter from that pup (perhaps because "it will settle her down" or because "it's not fair for the dog to be frustrated"!!!) with no other reason and no homes for the pups, is as negligent and irresponsible as the puppy mill owner. Both end up keeping the shelters filled.
OTOH vets are also responsible; the fees they charge in my
experience are out of all proportion for the time and effort involved, especially in neutering. I once helped a vet spay a cat; it took him about 10 minutes and this was in a barn, not the clinic. To charge $100 for that procedure and then wail about people not getting their animals spayed is hypocritical to me. Anaesthetic doesn't cost so much that his time was worth $600 an hour. Neutering takes even less time and is a lot simpler. If these fees were a fraction then more people would get their animals done.
It's also not exactly true that all purebreds are rife with problems and no mutts are. Although hybrid vigor does come into play they all carry the genes of their forbears and can still be heartbreakingly subject to the same things.
All of that said..I agree that training dogs is likely to be much more rewarding financially than breeding. To get the financial rewards from breeding the dogs do have to do something unusually well and you have to be able to prove it. That requires effort and usually money. Otherwise it's likely to be a thin margin.