Rob Irish wrote:Is that because of personal preference that you don't like a lime finish, or is there a practical reason for this?
Oh my...sorry if I inferred that...I would love a lime or earth floor in many design applications...It is the cost in both material and labor that drives it to the bottom of the list. I can mill
local tree species of a lower grade into larger dimension joist, and incorporate this into a timber frame structure that could, support a soapstone (or other variety of stone) with radiant heat for the same price (perhaps less) than a limecrete floor. As the market grows this could well change...and that would be great.
In many areas, wood is still going to be the most cost effective, easier to install and service, and more environmentally
sustainable. If one has lime stone close by and the skill sets or industry to work it, then there it could be more germane. I haven't found that yet, but would love to see it happen...especially for "grade floor" or below areas within building design.
I still would make pavers or thick tiles and not lay a monolithic slab...Slabs just lead to issues of all types from cracking to not easily servicing electrical/mechanicals that may be buried beneath them.
Rob Irish wrote:Just to clarify here, are you saying they had cracking issues with 100mm? Or was that a little typo and you meant to say they didn't have cracking issues at this size?
It was that they are monolithic, thick or thin, the potential is there, even if relief joints are cut into them. I have also see "crazing" in the finishes as well in some forms.
I would also note that I am a huge proponent of "disentanglement" in architecture and ease of serviceability. Monolithic slabs, no matter the modality, must be broken up to service anything that is under them, and/or just not as enduring as most "component based" methods. Even our most ancient of streets and roads are still comprised of small stone cobbles...not large stones...and these are 2000 plus years old. I also find that this method is more "user friendly" in as much that you can work at a pace that is often more manageable...on tile/paver at a time on a bed of well draining sand, small stone, or some other appropriate medium.
Rob Irish wrote:We've got a lot of Typha / Cattail here we collected for cob - would this be appropriate to use as a fibre?
Hmmm....that may work? Remember, lime is very caustic in nature so I would do a test paver as see how well is holds of to abrasion and abuse.
Rob Irish wrote:...I haven't broken down all the costs yet...Labor seems like it would be more intensive with lime, but that it would last longer...Could you elaborate a bit on your approach for a wood floor?
You must look at both your labor and some unit metric of cost (square foot, meter, kilo,...board foot...something.)
Wood floors, depending on species and type can last well over 500 years...perhaps not as long as a well made lime paver floor...yet acceptable.
I have been trying to find the time...
...to write up a Post on Maru floors. Traditional Korean maru (maru=floor) floors, one form being Cheongmaru
청마루 have been around for millenia, and some are even of stone and allow for radiant heat underneath in the form of an Ondol
온돌 , which is something else I am planning a post topic on.
If you haven't you should read this post:
Raised Earth Foundations
Warm Regards,
j