As I worked my way through the
solar workshop podcasts, the idea came up that the evil planned obsolescence
incandescent light bulb companies ...make their
light bulbs wear out prematurely. They went on to mention that you can buy, pretty inexpensively, 130V incandescent
light bulbs that last for literally thousands of hours. This is much longer than the wimpy 1000 to 1,500 rated hours of normal bulbs.
So, why don't we all use those?
Why indeed...there's a catch.
If you run the tungsten filament a less than the rated voltage, it will last a lot longer. There are legitimate examples of light bulbs running continuously for -decades- before burning out.
The problem is, you don't get as much light out.
So there's the catch. It lasts longer, but the lumens per watt drops off pretty fast. Less efficient at converting electricity to light.
Various opinions suggest that for a 12-15% reduction in voltage, you get a 25% reduction in lumens. Over the life of the lamp, the money you saved on lamp replacement would be more than made up for in the extra electricity to provide the same lumens.
I.e. you will probably have to put a 75W 130V bulb in to replace a 60W 120V bulb to get the same apparent brightness.
130V bulbs make a lot of sense if you get a lot of voltage spikes and you are burning out 120V bulbs at a furious pace, or if the bulb in in a location that is inconvenient or dangerous to replace.
There's no wrong
answer here, provided you understand the trade off you're making.
troy