• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Anne Miller
  • Leigh Tate
  • jordan barton
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Nicole Alderman
stewards:
  • r ranson
  • paul wheaton
  • Greg Martin
master gardeners:
  • Carla Burke
  • John F Dean
  • Jay Angler
gardeners:
  • Nancy Reading
  • Mike Barkley
  • L. Johnson

Old topic nuanced details

 
Posts: 28
Location: Lexington, KY
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I can't seem to find this question answered anywhere. I have Ed. 2 of Ianto's book and there are conflicting dimentia: the tunnel in written suggestion as 1/2 riser height but in a sample combustion unit sketch the riser height is measured (the arrow span) from the bottom of the tunnel whereas another sketch shows it measured from the top of the tunnel. This is a big difference.

What is best practice and specifically from where are the dimensions measures for riser height?
 
gardener
Posts: 3665
Location: Upstate NY, zone 5
253
4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
There is not an official standard for this. Various experts use different criteria. I like Peter Berg's "centerline" method, using a 1:2:4 ratio with "1" equaling somewhere between 0.7 and 1.3 x the system diameter... this as discussed I think in a thread on the donkey32.proboards.com forum. So the whole thing can be a bit bigger or smaller for a given system size. The bigger the combustion core proportions, the stronger the rocket effect. As mentioned in that thread, the "outer dimensions" method (length of longest surfaces) is alleged to be easier to apply if laying out a system live with bricks, while the centerline method is easier if laying out on paper/cad and especially if casting a core.
 
Forget this weirdo. You guys wanna see something really neat? I just have to take off my shoe .... (hint: it's a tiny ad)
Fermentation Intensive, San Diego, CA | Feb. 15-19, 2022
https://permies.com/t/173381/kitchen/Winter-Fermentation-Intensive-San-Diego
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic