Hey Bart,
It more or less sounds like; Stay within the borders of that what has already been used and proven safe to use, and durable.
Don't look any further, for most will be worthless to look at anyway.
Gosh...sorry...I don't mean for that at all...
Like I stated above...I love experimentation and re-examination of historical, as well as, contemporary concepts. However...apples and oranges...so very often the internet takes folks down the path of not creating something new and unique...but...reinventing the wheel...with means, methods and materials that are NOT as efficient or as durable than what is already working quite well.
I will own that I am very old fashioned in many was and tend not to fix to many things that aren't broken and working well as they are...
Portland/lime combination has been used for ages, sometimes only with lime. This also is mentioned on the traditional oven site.
So, why would this not be good enough for rocket stove cores?
I would have to read the exact application...especially about portlands, as these just can't stand up to heat at all...as I feel this may well be taken far out of context. Yes, lime, and just simple clay slip is often used in many different types of traditional
wood burn devices...as mortar. They are not used as the elements that makes up the "working body" of firebrick or soapstone building blocks that take the brunt of the thermal forces...
If there is a good working example, I would love studying it and learning more about it.
In this combination, gravel normally is used, crushed firebrick or perlite.
Why not sawdust? It would create a honeycomb structure.
As stated...there are no examples (that I know of?) that can make a viable working clay (or clay like) body to form a durable and functional firebrick with these materials. Gravel (usually a steatite form, crushed firebrick (aka "grog"), perlite, etc. etc. .... may sometimes be a limited additive to some clay bodies...they do not constitute a major element in firebricks and typically are in the interstitial zones as a mortar or perhaps a sacrificial element of the "firing device."
Fireclay, the same. I have seen bread ovens in Limburg, 150 years old, made with a clay straw mixture. So again, why not with with sawdust. The HEDON site states that the durability and insulative characters of the clay/sawdust mixture is rather good.Or is this faulty information?
So here we go...comparing apples and oranges...
A bread oven , of which many I have restored the vernacular and historic forms of , and made contemporary replications, are not, nor ever will see, the temperatures of a combustion chamber in a kiln or similar wood burning device like a
RMH. Maximum temps a bread oven may see (and not for very long duration) is perhaps 400 °C to 500 °C.
I would further point out that many of the historic vernacular design have in them sacrificial layers and elements that are meant to be routinely replaced and restored...Even some types of traditional kilns such as the Japanese Anagama 穴窯 Step or Mountain side kilns may have designed into them "sacrificial components" and layers that are in places that can be easily serviced and/removed. These very well may (as I have seen and used these methods) sawdust, oyster shell hot lime, natural cements and other pozilonics in there building...all of which is sacrificial and replaced...often with each firing as they just
can not endure the thermal cyclic shock of continued use...
Tearing down a RMH once to several times a year is not a goal worth attaining just to achieve a more insulative layer...Especially when better designs and material applications already exist.