Check out ourwebsite of herbal goodness!
It's never too late to start! I retired to homestead on the slopes of Mauna Loa, an active volcano. I relate snippets of my endeavor on my blog : www.kaufarmer.blogspot.com
Su Ba wrote:
1- predators. My number one predator is the I'o, the Hawaiian hawk. It's on the endangered list so there's no steps that I can take to kill or harass it. If my hens are not protected in the morning, I will often lose one every day if the female hawks have young. Thus my hens are in roofed pens until mid-afternoon, when predation is lower. And I maintain several sacrificial roosters to help alert the hens when a hawk comes by, though many times I've seen a hawk swoop over without even the roosters seeing it until too late. I lose at least a rooster a month.
Su Ba wrote:
2- pressure from feral pigs and dogs makes hedgerows not workable, nor electric net fences. A feral pig can burst right through. I have a hard enough time keeping them out with heavy gauge field fence and two strands of barbed wire at ground level. And rock walls have to be 4 foot high to keep them from jumping over. I've had pigs dismantle dry stack rock walls.
Su Ba wrote:
4- feed is a considerable expense if purchased. Thus I've developed my own system of using garden waste, foraged waste, farm grown feed, and grass clippings to feed the hens in the mornings. Afternoons they can forage. With the hens needing plenty of protein and calcium to keep up egg production, I supply that rather then assuming they could find enough on their own. Egg production is important to me, so mediocre production due to mediocre feed supply won't cut it on my homestead.
Su Ba wrote:
5- water. Periodic drought is a common condition here. So dreams of running streams are just that, dreams. There is often not enough water. And during droughts, water is too precious to simply allow to run onto the ground. Thus we use a water nipple set into a 5 gallon bucket. This keeps the water clean and not much gets wasted. Plus mosquitos can't lay their eggs since the bucket is lidded.
Check out ourwebsite of herbal goodness!
Zach Muller wrote:Simon raising chickens doesn't have to be serious, you can have fun while doing it!😉
Zach Muller wrote:
Being in an urban environment means I have to have a solid coop for when agents of sadness are lurking around my property, but on the other hand I am isolated inside the city between a major highway, and a major street so many of my local natural predators don't come around. I have had some hawk attacks surprisingly, but there is enough cover that none of the chickens have been taken.
Even in a small urban space I am essentially doing a paddock shift, but with a semi stationary coop. Being stationary is not a problem since I use deep woodchips and leaves as the floor ( which become fertility for the forest garden once the coop has moved).
Zach Muller wrote:
I love the idea of fully mobile chickens always out in their paddocks living it up, but for me I needed a few special features being in the city.
- need to have control of if and when the chickens are let out into paddocks
Zach Muller wrote:
- need to be able to easily grab rooster to put him in his separate sleeping quarters ( for noise reduction in the morning)
Zach Muller wrote:
- need nesting boxes in a controlled space suitable for broody hens Doing there thing
Zach Muller wrote:
My current hybrid paddock system is what I have come up with thus far.
On another note, there are other stationary coop designs that can work beautifully, roosts over a fish pond is a classic permaculture example. A design that I first setup when I moved here a year ago was a bottomless coop setup over a swale. Chickens poop in swale, rain comes and disburses the poop, very clean and easy.
Check out ourwebsite of herbal goodness!
I would think having a movable coop you can still lock them up in would take care of this. Let them out when it works, and lock them up when it doesn't. Moving the coop between paddocks could determine which area they had access to.
Adding nesting boxes to the movable coop seems to me like it could solve this problem. Maybe not though. The chickens might prefer to nest in some other place.
Whenever possible, Zone II should include a range of some high manurial animals like chickens, and they should be housed at the edge of Zone I, or very close to it. Here we can exploit a larger system (zone II) to enrich a smaller one (zone I), through the use of an animal converter.
Zach Muller wrote:
Whenever possible, Zone II should include a range of some high manurial animals like chickens, and they should be housed at the edge of Zone I, or very close to it. Here we can exploit a larger system (zone II) to enrich a smaller one (zone I), through the use of an animal converter.
If the chickens are left in zone II to range and sleep then the only direct enrichment coming back into zone I is the eggs, which being in zone II would require more time and energy to collect. To me it Seems like missing a great opportunity to use an edge.
Although it is kind of a choice, if your zone I is not in need of fertility (lucky you) than you probably don't want to move the manure to your garden just for fun, and a paddock system in zone II would be ideal. However, my zone I garden needs fertility, even with hugel, legumes, dynamic accumulators, the manure is a good boost.
Mollison goes on to show combo systems that include a strawyard with openings directly into zone II/zone III paddocks, and also access to chicken tractor garden beds (zone I). The strawyard is covered with rough mulch from an outer zone which is processed into a finer mulch which can be pushed out into zone II (or I) plantings as needed. Moving this organic matter through the system is maybe too much work for some people, but it creates mulch, fertilizer, eggs, possibly heat if you use a greenhouse coop design, all right there on the border of zone I. And really the chickens went out all through zone II and III picking up bugs for you, and fertilizing, so they saved you a lot of work for you already. Also Mollison includes a field roost structure that can be moved around in the deeper part of zone III that I am envisioning as something a lot like your moveable structure.
Maybe talking permaculture zones is not what you had in mind for your article, and I totally get that (its a snooze for normal folks). But I would like to know how your paddocks fit into the larger scheme of your entire system? If you did want to make your article more in depth than addressing zones and functions may be a good way to do it.
Check out ourwebsite of herbal goodness!
Simon Johnson wrote:
So I think the lines between zone I and zone II could be blurred more. Maybe zone I, or a decent sized section of it, become a paddock for the chickens to visit once in a while. Maybe they don`t visit this paddock during their regular rotation, but maybe a couple times a year, like spring and or fall. Now the chickens are doing all the excellent work they were doing in zone II, but now it`s in zone I and you don`t have to do any shovelling. The zone I set up could be much less formalized than the standard zone I. )
Simon Johnson wrote:forums at permies.com and keep the learning going.
Whathever you are, be a good one.
___________________________________
a tiny voice in my head can't shut up about this tiny ad:
Learn Permaculture through a little hard work
https://wheaton-labs.com/bootcamp
|