Tim Straw wrote:
So I'll create a thermal break, pile sand on until it just kisses the pipes,then build the thermal battery.
I don't think I'd carry the sand that high. It is an insulator, not a thermal mass; instead, I would have an inch or two of sand, as insulation, but I would want thermal mass to be in contact with the duct work all the way around, and thick enough to get good heat gain. For example, say you only had 1/2-inch of thermal mass on the bottom of the ducts, and then the sand below that, but had several inches of thermal mass on the sides and top of the ducting. What happens?
The 1/2-inch obviously heats up to the saturation point, and then begins radiating heat, trying to warm the sand.
The question is how this compares with the sides and top that have several inches of thermal mass, instead of just 1/2 inch. Which "pulls" heat faster? Thermal mass you are going to use, sucking the heat into the mass, or the hot thermal mass touching the sand? I'm not positive of
the answer, maybe someone else will be. It just seems to me that since higher temperature differences speed heat transfer, it would make sense to reduce the temperature of the thermal mass touching the sand.
Tim Straw wrote:
I don't have a enough of brick / rock to do all the thermal battery. What do you think about mixing pea gravel with clay slip to the consistency of concrete and pouring / packing it in. I think that this would be relatively quick and inexpensive.
Good general idea, but way too much water.
It is good to use the clay to pack in around the pea gravel, that will drive out any air gaps (do some packing and tamping as you fill, to better discourage air gaps from forming). But if it is so wet you can actually pour it like concrete, you are using a great deal more water than needed, and that is only going to increase the drying time. I would suggest just using enough water to let the clay and gravel pack nicely.