• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nancy Reading
  • Carla Burke
  • r ranson
  • John F Dean
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
stewards:
  • Jay Angler
  • Liv Smith
  • Leigh Tate
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
  • Timothy Norton
gardeners:
  • thomas rubino
  • Jeremy VanGelder
  • Maieshe Ljin

Working backwards

 
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi everyone,

I've been admiring rocket stoves for some time now and would like to build one to heat water for my small dairy.

The reason I named this post working backwards is because I have owned an old cast iron wood chip water heater for years and want to get it going.
From what I've read the dimensions of the intake, burn chamber and riser are all important in making it work.
I'd like to use the heater as the the riser and need some advise on whether this is practical and then what dimensions other sections should be.

Think of the heater as a cast iron water jacket tube, originally the fire was burnt in the centre and flued straight out.

The burn chamber dimensions are 240mm internally at the bottom with a very slight taper reducing to 220mm at the top with a height of 240mm, this is the proposed riser (I can add more height by mounting a small barrel sitting on top if need be)

Are these dimensions too big for it to work? If not, what intake, burn chamber, barrel (I have a 44G drum on hand for the outer) and flue is recommended?

I'd be very grateful for any guidance...

Cheers
Chris
 
Posts: 120
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Chris Cansdale wrote: (I have a 44G drum on hand for the outer

Cheers
Chris



Just a clarification since you haven't any location listed, Are you outside the US and talking Imperial gallons? What we call a 44 gallon drum the Yanks I know call a 55 gallon drum. Something to do with the early Yankees missing a few fluid ounces when first standardising their pints and quarts. 3.8L per Gal vs 4.5L per Gal
 
Rocket Scientist
Posts: 4526
Location: Upstate NY, zone 5
574
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Are you thinking of using the water jacketed part as the riser? It sounds like the original unit had water immediately surrounding the fire chamber, which would effectively heat water but cool the chamber walls. A rocket mass heater requires a highly insulated, extremely hot combustion chamber including riser, and then puts its heat through a mass to be absorbed.
 
Glenn Herbert
Rocket Scientist
Posts: 4526
Location: Upstate NY, zone 5
574
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
220/240 mm is close to 10" diameter, which is a very powerful system. The typical house heater is 8", and I haven't actually heard of someone building a bigger one. So the question here is, how much water do you want to heat, and by how much?


The burn chamber is only 240mm high? This sounds not like a part of the combustion core at all, but something you would mount above the riser so hot gases could go all around it, perhaps fitted inside the top of a barrel.
 
Chris Cansdale
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes, I'm outside the US in Australia so imperial gallons.

The heater can sit wherever I like really. I just figured it would be easy to have this as the base of the riser, immediately after the burn chamber. The original heater only has a 240mm high burn chamber, a plate sat on top and it had the original flue drawing off that. This is why I said I can build on top of the original unit to increase the overall height.

I need up to 200l of hot water at it needs to be at about 90 degrees c.


 
Glenn Herbert
Rocket Scientist
Posts: 4526
Location: Upstate NY, zone 5
574
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The short answer is that you can't use this water jacket element as part of the combustion core and have good combustion efficiency. It will suck heat out of the fire and make it smoke.

You can use it above or after the combustion zone where there is only hot exhaust to handle.
 
Chris Cansdale
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Glen,
so the top of the riser would be ok?
 
Glenn Herbert
Rocket Scientist
Posts: 4526
Location: Upstate NY, zone 5
574
5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes, above the top of the riser should be okay (not as part of the riser).
 
Your mind is under my control .... your will is now mine .... read this tiny ad
Back the BEL - Invest in the Permaculture Bootcamp
https://permies.com/w/bel-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic