posted 8 years ago
Thanks for all your input!
To update on SOME of my questions. I did more research, but I would LOVE verification from the experts.
The average weight of a rocket-mass heater 5ft long is like 1800 lbs. The average weight of a cast-iron wood-burning stove is about 400 lbs. 1800 lbs would probably exceed the floor weight limit 4-fold. So, I thought I would think about making it out of fire brick, but that only takes the weight down to 650 lbs. Still too much for my comfort. Now, being realistic: the ductwork will go up 30ft of masonry structure before exiting the house, which is like a 30ft long vertical mass of a rocket mass. The problem is: vertical, which means if the air starts out really hot, it moves really fast and spends less time sharing it's warmth. Any ideas? I was thinking I could do a 3ft firebrick-mass bench to get the temp down a few hundred degrees. I was also thinking about ways that I can more efficiently remove heat from the barrel. Nothing novel popped into my mind yet. The most I was thinking is curling pipe around it and having the inlet along the floor and outlet above the fire place (maybe shaped like a dragon for the AWESOME factor).
Second is hazard. The fire area (barrel and inlet) can remain in the fireplace, leaving only potential duct work outside the fireplace. This would also allow for doors to close off the super-heated parts if small kids are around. I could possibly hook up some small fans to the screen doors this could potentially have, also increasing heat circulation. Again, any input would be great!
The third thing is wood. I do not want to take power tools to make my wood I decided because that means I use electricity to refine my biofuel. Doesn't make a huge amount of sense to me. However, I found if sticks are sufficiently dry, I can snap them pretty easy, especially if they are the good type of wood (not the invasive branchy, thorn-like stick thing that lines the wind-break currently). I estimate I could get about 1 cord of sticks per year. My house is about 1800 sq ft . I am compensating with as much insulation, close-offs, and passive solar and heating as I can, and I am pretty sure the bedrooms will continue to be heated by space heaters. We also work out of the house 4 days a week, needing less heat for those hours. I think the one cord will be enough for what purpose this will serve (i.e. down-stairs heat for 2 hours x 4 days + 24 x 2 = 56/week x 24 weeks/year).
My biggest qualm now with doing this is that if all I can get is a 3ft pad before the house starts breaking, then, is it worth it? I think at that point it might be cheaper and more efficient, faster, and easier to get a wood-burning stove with a little blower, but I'd be happy for someone to convince me otherwise.
Glenn, I've heard those statistics before, but I have not heard the details, therefore I am skeptical. If they were so inefficient, then how did people survive when they were the only source of heat? Why would they be the imagery of a warm winter home? It doesn't make sense. I have used fire places before and sat around them for the yummy warmth too. How could I do that with -5% efficiency? It seems these numbers might be factoring a fire place used 5 times a year and otherwise let sit with inefficient doors or damper. Then, I could understand- it's a hole in the house's insulation. However, an actual working fireplace that's well positioned (like ours is) and well maintained and used I can't imagine fitting that category.
Work smarter, not harder.