posted 8 years ago
I think one of the reasons is that today there is an expectation that everything must be a science. Granted I am just a dumb sheep farmer and lack education on every front, but in my world of talking with agronomists and dealing with governmental regulators, I often have to speak their talk. Take yesterday for example, I was engaged in an alternative energy grant and thus used terms like efficiency equation and geothermal. While the latter is hardly that scientific sounding, it was far more then what I was really talking; a stupid culvert buried underground to bring 57 degree air temps to the surface. It was a simple, low tech solution to a costly problem I am having. Even the technical advisor (also known as a grant writer), admitted we had to change the wording up to make it sound more official and technical. But that is a governmental resource and they love to waste money on technical things when a simple solution is often best...when there is a government program for it that is.
I think as permiculturists we do the same thing.
I was farming back in the 1990's when farmers were shunned and looked down upon, but not everything had to be a science. I don't even have a barn here, according to the Natural Resouese Conservation Service I have a covered heavy use area with end walls. A BARN! Now even the simple growing of grass is so super-technical. and I think it prohibits new farmers from thinking permicultural farming is something they can do.
I think all this relates to your unfortunate situation because technical terminology sounds expensive. When I read, "How do permaculturists break into the world of international "development" projects and expand the current agroforestry paradigms?" it sounds what you are proposing to do in a given area is expensive. Unless that area has adequate funding...it is not going to get addressed or even a reply back. I realize you are not proposing to remediate any of my farm here in the Northeast, but to anyone that was, I would read that statement, see dollar signs, and move on with my life. Now I know permiculture is all about observation, making small incremental changes to do a lot of good, but simple often means inexpensive, and that I can do.
I wish I had an answer for you, I guess if it is anything it is to learn how to speak to those that can hire consultants. When I worked for the railroad as a safety coordinator, my morality was driven by my desire to see less workers injured and killed, but for my superiors...I answered directly to the chief financial officer after all...was in learning to speak in dollars. I could not merely say, "doing this will reduce 15 hand injuries per month"...that got me nowhere, no I had to say, "doing this will save $50,000 in workers compensation costs." Sad, but it is how I got funding for what I wanted. For a consulting permiculturist, while I know your heart is in performing remediation of degraded lands, it comes down to money and the better you can speak that language, I think you will get better results.
As for my own farm, yes it comes down to money as well. I have a house that is unoccupied on 30 acres of unused land, and I live in the capital of the permicultural world. My wife and I both know that a thumb tacked advertisement at the local gas station and their bulletin board would get us a permiculturist renter in a days time, but due to liability, we just don't dare try. It is sad, willing people to try permiculture on unused land, but with laws against the landowner, it is sadly best to let the house and land sit idle. And I am not alone in that here, so I know I am not a special situation. Liability today is hurting what you propose as well.