(So you know what you're getting into: I am going to lay out what our CSA has been, pros and cons thereof, what my thinking is going forward, and ask for input and advice at the end.)
This year (2017) is the third straight that we have offered a poultry CSA. (You can check out particulars
here.)
The share consists of a variety of table birds at a variety of ages: heritage
chickens (as 1-lb. poussin, 2-lb. broilers, 3-lb. fryers, and 4-lb. roasters), duck (Pekin and Muscovy), guinea fowl, heritage turkeys, and geese.
The first year, we set a goal of 12 lb. per month. (Depending on the bird, it was a certain number at a certain weight, varying month to month.). This was somewhat arbitrary, but it seemed a reasonable amount. Because this was (it turned out) too much for some folks, we offered a full share and half share the next year. For year three, we did away with the roaster
chickens, and moved some things around a bit (duck in early spring as well as fall, guineas twice instead of once). We also changed the pricing structure so that the upfront payment covered only the smallest possible turkey and goose; the customer would pay the balance upon pickup. This made it more fair, as each customer would then pay for exactly what he or she received, rather than paying for the average and getting something larger or smaller. Lastly, we offered an a la carte option, so people could order precisely what they wanted rather than the pre-determined share. One out of thirteen customers chose this.
Pros of this model:
* By having a set price for each share, the cost per item and cost per pound is effectively hidden. It's no secret that it takes money, and a fair bit of it, to produce poultry in this particular way. Maybe some folks work out the math anyway, but there is some pricing psychology at work in keeping individual amounts somewhat hidden.
* Folks seem to enjoy the pre-set shares. I don't know if this is because it's simply easier than selecting everything oneself, if they're just happy with the amounts of what's in the share and have no desire to deviate, or what. I expected the a la carte option to be employed more widely, but alas.
Cons of this model:
* It binds us to a quota. This is what precipitated our looking afresh at the whole concept. On a farm, things die. Predators, weather, disease, no reason whatsoever. They just die. It's stressful
enough when those deaths amount to monetary loss, but even more stressful when we still owe our customers those birds, or an equivalent value. (Yes, part of the CSA concept is "shared risk," but I don't think that reaches here. It's one thing to say, "Gee, the beets failed, but you're still getting a lot of other stuff." It's another to say, "Well, we don't have birds for you this month. Thanks for the money, though." Especially when we feel that at least part of that loss could have been avoided.)
* It is concerned with only part of what we produce, and we are left to market everything else through other channels. In other words, it doesn't recognize the whole farm and its interrelated components.
So what we are considering for next year is a complete shake-up. Rather than offering a Poultry CSA, we'll offer a whole-farm CSA, a la carte. Folks would pay a certain amount up front (we'll set a minimum), and they can purchase what they want when they want, and we'll deduct it from their balance. They can add more money at any time. We will develop a chart that shows what we'll have throughout the season.
Pros of this method:
* Flexibility. Customers can get as much as they want (within reason), when they want it. If they're out of town, no problem. They can avoid things they don't like and stock up on things they do.
* Competition. Most everything would be sold first come, first served, which will hopefully incentivize spending.
* There is no money changing hands. All actual "sales" took place at the beginning of the season. This makes it more likely that customers will be more free to add things to each order/pickup, since they're not directly paying for it.
* Ideally, this will help us move away from the drudgery of the farmers market.
Potential problems:
* Matching production with sales. I'm not concerned with the possibility of overselling shares/dollar amount, but with the possibility that some folks are particularly stingy with their balance and rarely redeem it. In other words, we're producing lots of X, but people are holding out for Y. Hopefully this is avoided by points two and three above. If we still have problems, we'll just have to explore other sales outlets, which will probably be required anyway.
* The exact price per pound is clearly seen, which might turn people away from some items that they might otherwise want.
There are other pros and cons, but I'm feeling done typing on this little phone, and I think those are the main ones anyway, so I'll leave it at that.
What changes would you make? Suggestions? Other thoughts?