Hello Karol,
Thanks for the reply!
I have been thinking about putting the copper directly into the pipe. However there are a few things to say about.
Since you need full heat to have secondary burning in the pipe, I am afraid to lose temperature with the water inside.
Copper is very expensive. After informing several plumbers to ask if copper could stand longterm direct heating they all said no, so it would be a constant cost.
After spending days of watching and thinking about this system, I think I have found my problem. I don't have enough mass around the water to sustain contant heating. After 2 min of burning the stove and than running the water trough the tube, I generate steam and hot water for about 1 minute and than it cools down. I have decreased water pressure, installed a smaller tube (in diameter) but with no results. A conventional gas heater has his copper surrounded by water (very good conductor) wich is used to have more mass around the copper, so it wouldn't cool down that much. (and is used for the central heating system).
What I need is a good conductor around my tube, but that would go directly into the stove principals since it needs a very good insulator.
So now my question:
Is there something that has enough insulating qualities for the stove principals, so I can generate enough heat. But still can give me enough conducting mass around my tube?
The specifics of the copper tube we are using at the moment are; 10 mm inner diameter, 1 mm wall, 15 meters long.
Thanks!
Pieter (Lola's man)