Trace Oswald wrote:
Robbie Asay wrote:with those that became entitled to tell us how to run things because they paid for it.
In fairness, that is a different situation in my mind. If people directly help you pay for something, I believe they should have some say in how things are run. If they help pay indirectly, like purchasing videos that Paul made or something, I don't believe that entitles anyone to have any say.
When people join a discussion board they do so because they have an interest. If they decide to stay it's because there's something they like about it that warrants sticking around, such as the community that develops. Most often that's a direct result of the owners vision and why they started the board. That doesn't mean that they aren't open to suggestion but it does mean that they aren't obligated to use those suggestions no matter how good they may appear to the person making them.
The same is true when asking for funds to pay for the site in some way. If people enjoy the content that much that they are willing to volunteer some cash for it, that's exactly what it is, you are contributing to assist in the continuation of what you like. Many times there are goodies offered and maybe tier packages based on the amount paid. But one thing is very clear; you are only getting what is offered and what you pay for. At no time is that an invitation to be able to influence the direction of the board. The owner still owns the board, you aren't buying a stake in it and one is not being offered. This is a unfortunate but common misconception.
If I help someone pay their rent they are under no obligation to allow me to tell them how to keep their house. I merely assisted them in being able to continue to live there because their friendship(or in this case community) is worth it.