Tereza Okava wrote:One thing we hear in the mechanic shop every day is "my car is such a gas hog". Most of the time the person in question came screaming in and goes screaming out. Drive the limit- take it easy. If you're coming up on a stop sign or light there's no need to accelerate-- you have to stop soon anyway! I was super lucky to learn to drive on a tractor hauling heavy loads. Drive calm and you'll accelerate less and get better mileage.
Ahmet Oguz Akyuz wrote:Hi David,
I am using Lithium (LiFePO4 to be specific) at 48V. The battery box has a BMS in it and I can monitor the individual cells (there are 16 of them) using an app. But the inverter has no communication with the BMS -- it is an hybrid inverter rated at 6.2 kW. So I think my inverter is already relying on the global battery voltage readings from the poles of the battery. Is this a problem?
If I add a second charge controller, which in the mean-time I realized to be quite an expensive option, it would also connect to the battery poles directly and would sample the battery voltage from there. But I will make sure to enter the same battery settings for the existing inverter and the new MPPT.
I do have a question regarding the MPPT choice. Given that my panel specs are 320W-410W 32V-40V 7.7A-10A and I will connect 6 of these in series, can you recommend me a budget-friendly MPPT that will work with them. Victron models are unfortunately very expensive.
Also, I noticed that inverters can consume non-negligible battery capacity at night. The aforementioned 6.2 kW inverter easily eats up around 15% of my 100 Ah battery. Do you know if charge controllers also consume such capacity?
Thanks.
Anne Miller wrote:Thanks for bringing this up as I have more questions.
How strict are airlines for carry on luggage?
I don't want to buy luggage and plan to use bags that we already have.
The duffel bag is bigger than the 22 x 14 x 9 that is stated. If I have to pay to check the bag it is cheaper than buying luggage.
I want to put the laptop in a backpack that is bigger than the 9 x 10 x 17 to fit under the seat. I can put my feet on the part that will not fit.
I really worry about my stuff getting broken if I have to check the bags.
I am spending our daughter inheritance to make this trip.
Dakota Miller wrote:
D Nikolls wrote:I use a system with a 50micron, 10/1 micron, 0.5 micron in series, followed by a Luminor GUV-4S LED UV treatment.
I run it at well under 1GPM, into a 40 gallon stainless tank that gravity feeds the sink. Sink is the only water source in the tinyhouse.
I like the energy efficiency of the very small UV system that I can use with such low flow, and batch filtering keeps power usage super low.
Your system sounds pretty good to me; I haven't used a RO system before for comparison..
I would want to hit the shower water with 1micron/UV, personally. I usually take my mouth with me into the shower, so it just seems less worrisome to treat that water like it might meet my mouth.
Main issue in my system that may also pertain to yours; first flush diverter and coarse filtration before the main storage tank. I have a first flush diverter using a screen at the intake, a float to divert water to tank when diverter full, and a small weep hole to allow it to drain slowly.
It sucks, it clogs in multiple ways, and it runs all the water over the accumulated debris. I will start from scratch on this part of the system next time round.
I am thinking covered gutters, centrifugal first flush diverter, and a barrel sand/gravel filter before storage.. time will tell.
Ok. I think I found the same unit. The specs me it
(30 mJ/cm2 at 95% UVT) 0.6 GPM
(40 mJ/cm2 at 95% UVT) 0.4 GPM
So it looks good.
I'm wondering if I set up a low flow rate UV system, how would it affect the physical filters? If I recall correctly the standard Culligan candle style filters need at least 20gpm to work properly? Maybe I need some sort of flow/pressure regulation between the prefilters and RO. And between the RO and UV.