Donald MacRae

+ Follow
since Jul 20, 2015
Connecticut Shoreline, Vermont mountains, and someday someplace remote in New Hampshire
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
0
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
0
Received in last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand First Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Donald MacRae

Glenn Herbert wrote:It's early yet for details of your third system, but you need to keep in mind that there is a limit to the length of horizontal flue you can run through the mass benches. For an 8" system, that is about 50', minus 5' for every 90 degree bend. You will not have enough length to run even halfway around any but the smallest of houses. I would suggest identifying the main gathering space and put your bench there, while keeping it open to the rest of the space for radiant and convective heat flow. The RMH generally wants to be near the center of the whole house, unless there is a zone that benefits from staying cooler.



I attempted to post a reply to this yesterday but for some reason it didn't show up .. initial plan was central RMH with a bench around the entire building but your comment about the limit to length has me re-thinking the "plan". this will be a small 2-4 person weekend hunting cabin. Cord construction, Hex building, 8 feet per side, with entrance on one side. Now thinking to place the RMH on opposite wall from the door and SPLIT the flue under the bell through TWO benches on either side of the Hex. If i keep the total CSA of both benches' flue same as the combined riser it should work right? something like this:


and i had another question .. you said "length of horizontal flue" .. what qualifies as horizontal .. I was thinking if the first section from the bell is under the bench and the two 90 degree elbows also raise the second half of the flue about 10 inches above the level of the first it might help with draft .. again still brainstorming till i play with smaller versions
dmac257

3 years ago
I have been reading for a couple weeks and looking at plans online and there seems to be LOTS of different methods to make a rocket stove, especially if they are USED for different purposes. So I wanted to clarify my understanding before I start building the three rocket stoves I have in my near future.

First stove I want to make is a portable cook stove. Can in a Can, L shaped inner chamber. I have seen MANY different construction methods and wondered which is better and why?
Loose rock : https://hemetsunshine.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/inside-a-tin-can-rocket-stove/
Sand : https://hemetsunshine.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/inside-a-tin-can-rocket-stove/
Fiberglass : http://www.thebugoutbagguide.com/category/urban-wilderness-survival/page/3/ as shown in step 5 of the construction
or something else ??

Second stove I want will be for semi-permanant cooking on a deck or patio simular to https://www.pinterest.com/pin/178877416424224159/ but maybe separate wood feed and air inlet. Again I don't know which insulation to use.

Third will be last build and will be the most ambitious. Much larger Mass Heater and I know I would want to have a LOT of thermal mass warm up ... Hex shaped cord wall building with a central rocket stove with a small under ground "exhaust" tunnel to the bench that goes all the way around the hex interior and up above the roof line at the end.. plans will begin after I figure out what works best for the first two and play a bit with stacked fire bricks and such.

I should build the first one this weekend ..second will be after the end of the month when I get some cash.
dmac257
3 years ago