Win a copy of Herbal Medicine From the Heart of the Earth this week in the Medicinal Herbs forum!

Jason Broom

+ Follow
since May 23, 2017
Apples and Likes
Total received
In last 30 days
Total given
Total received
Received in last 30 days
Total given
Given in last 30 days
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand First Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Jason Broom

When you get a rocket stove "rocketing", the heat is enough for metal to start spalling.  Where do those tiny bits of metal have the potential of winding up?  In the food you were cooking.

The only way I would ever use metal for a rocket stove is if the heat was fed into a self-contained metal cook top, usually protected with firebrick of some kind.  The gases heat the cook top before circulating around and exiting through a flue.  Having made the mistakes with metal, I now know to stick to high-temp masonry products (firebrick or ceramic fiber/fiberboard) for the burn chamber and riser.  There's nothing more frustrating that building a rocket "stove", only to find out it won't get hot enough to cook the way you'd hoped.  The best way I've found (by doing a lot of things wrong) is to build a properly sealed and insulated masonry core...that's when things get HOT!  
1 month ago
The wood-burning fireplace insert in my home has a plenum chamber above it, with twin ducts that run vertically, through the mass of the original fireplace, and tie into the hot air return for my HVAC system.  The air intake for this plenum chamber is located in the brick facade, several inches above the doors of the insert.  When I've had a fire going for a sufficient period of time, depending on how cold it is, the heat in the plenum chamber creates enough of a draw to slowly draw in air and "force" it through the balance of the duct work of the HVAC system.  If I manually turn on the blower motor for the propane fueled heater, it takes about 8-10 minutes to normalize temperatures throughout the home.  During those times that I keep a good fire going, I use absolutely no propane or electricity, while keeping our house much warmer than we normally would.  It is nowhere near as clean or efficient as a rocket mass heater, but it feels great, just the same!

While that is not exactly what you are asking about, it's pretty close.  I think the problem with pulling air through the mass of any RHM, and using it to supplement the heat from a conventional forced air system, is that the inherent flaws of a forced air system will quickly cool the mass of the RMH.  I hope your experimentation proves me incorrect.
4 months ago
An inefficient burn and off-center riser could have created a constriction in airflow between the top of the riser stack and the top of the barrel.

I have seen fly ash build up very quickly in this area (sometimes within just a few weeks) and your 3" gap is now down to 1.5", or less.
6 months ago
The "M" in RMH stands for "mass".  Mass sufficient to the needs of heating a living space is inherently not portable.  

Also, yurts are often built on some kind of raised platforms, at least the ones I've seen, and any such platform would need to be built sturdy enough to support the weight (mass) of an RMH.

As noted in one of the links, the Korean Ondol solution might be a good one for a yurt, where floor space is already quite limited.
6 months ago
I tried dry-stacking a variety of materials and was frustrated with the results.  In my ignorance, I blamed the materials, when the real crux of the problem was the number of air leaks in the systems I built.  Before I heeded the advice to create a sealed riser, at the very least, I had to use a small fan to force enough air into the burn chamber to generate the kind of heat I wanted to see.  After I sealed the riser and burn chamber properly, two of the three materials I had been playing with worked very well.  The third was a concrete paver and simply too porous to create enough heat, unless I was patient enough for that entire mass to get really warm, which took anywhere from 30 to 120 minutes, depending on conditions.

Once I built a proper, sealed unit, out of suitable materials, I had 500 degrees (F) or more within just a couple of minutes of starting the stove.  This was the difference between a rocket stove that I could barely simmer soup on to one that would get a cast iron pan hot enough to sear meat properly.  Also, the amount of smoke coming out of the riser decreased dramatically when I finally had it burning hot enough.  Those are my experiences with dry-stacking.
7 months ago
First of all, you are to be commended on the excellent graphics and detailed instructions.  Even someone unfamiliar with DIY projects could follows your diagrams and written explanations to build the tin can rocket stove you describe.

My experience with a well-made rocket stove is that they simply get too hot to use metal for the core.  The heat and erosion from oxidation result in the metal being worn away, potentially winding up in your food.

I need to stop being lazy and make a video or quality diagrams, like yours, about how to make a rocket stove from firebrick splits.  It's nowhere near as inexpensive, but will last a lot longer and likely be safer, if that is a concern at all.
7 months ago
I have made a rocket cook stove from metal, then from different masonry products, and finally from firebrick splits.  I can tell you that the metal ones work really well, until you realize that the spalling metal (tiny fragments being eroded away by heat and oxidation) has to go somewhere.
7 months ago
Be encouraged that alternative methods of heating and cooking with wood as a fuel source are definitely possible.  Whether or not your design is safe or effective can be best determined by first building a "known good" design.  From this you would learn a great deal about the basic principles of "rocket" heating and cooking solutions, both of which are based on centuries-old masonry solutions from eastern and northern Europe.  Almost all of the ideas, good and bad, have already been tried.  The good news is the lessons have been learned and you can benefit from those.  Once you have learned what DOES work, you'll have a better understanding of why your idea may or may not work, and you'll know how to gauge the relative degree of success you achieve.
7 months ago
Setting aside the capture of particulate matter, the purpose of a bell is to absorb and gradually release as much heat energy as possible to the space and the people that need to be warmed.  While a simple concrete block structure might be a good first layer, a properly constructed bell will include a second layer that helps seal the chamber and stores/transmits heat more effectively.  Whether you are building a masonry stove or a rocket mass heater, certain products have been proven to store and radiate heat better than others.  For masonry heaters, soapstone has always been the material of choice, while rocket mass heaters frequently employ the much more cost effective cob.  The soapstone is much more beautiful and expensive, while cob is relatively ugly and labor-intensive to make/apply.  It depends on your budget and your preferred aesthetic.
9 months ago
Something not yet mentioned is that Rocket Mass Heaters are basically a more cost-conscious version of a masonry heater, one that uses inexpensive, locally-sourced materials and is generally built by the home owner.  

If your wife is concerned about aesthetics, a masonry heater looks like a beautiful fireplace, although it usually quite a bit more expensive to build.
9 months ago