Peter Chauffeur

+ Follow
since Sep 21, 2019
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
5
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
38
Received in last 30 days
1
Total given
13
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand First Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Peter Chauffeur

Update time My fellow Permies!  
Here are two pics of the recently built Mark III with the ceramic riser. I have added a picture of the Mark II and Mark III together so you can see the final size difference between the two side by side. I also installed two temperature gauges on the Mark III; one horizontal to the top of the riser and the second horizontal to the top of the exhaust. I have instructed my wife how to light this stove and her feedback is that it fires up and heats the house a little faster and of course, consumes a little more pellets over the course of the day.
So I’m happy to say that the Mark III has been installed and will continue to heat our home for another damp fall and soggy, chilly winter!  
The Mark II is destined for a new aquaponic greenhouse after the retrofit with the extra ceramic tubes I have left over and a new burner assembly
Stay tuned!
3 days ago
Update to the Mark III my friends.  I managed to evade some of the things on my wife's honey-do list and quickly wert back into the shop  to decrease the riser and the bell by 12 " each on the recently completed Mark III.  The result is a hotter running temp  of approxim. 425F that is horrizontal of the top of the riser, which is around 75F hotter than the standard run temp of the Mark II with the metal riser. The draft appears to be stronger so I can assume that I am also using slightly more wood pellets per hour, not a big deal, i will monitor how much more I use and give you all an answer when the weather gets a little colder.
So I am happy to confirm that the  ceramic riser was a good investment and I can now do an autopsy on the Mark II in the near future, followed with a Ceramic tube riser and then probably do some experimenting with a new burner / pellet feed assembly. The reason why I am sticking to a thick gauge metal square tube burner assembly is that it works well with pellet feeding.  I thank the Puritans for not freaking out about the metal burn tubes as they stray from the definition of the rocket mass heater but sometimes you have to work around convention.   The original burn tube assembly has lasted over 4 years now and continues to perform well.  Yes, there is some metal erosion on the outlet of the square tubing, just like all the gurus on this site have argued and it gives me an excuse to fabricate a new one where I can tinker with a couple of ideas that have been rattling around in my head.
Peace, Health and Happiness to all.
Happy Thanksgiving Canada's is in October
1 week ago
well everyone, I fired up the new design today only to find that the stove ran sub par to the old Mark II. Although the flame into the base of the riser seemed to be more vigorous than the Mark II. When I added the bell housing on top of the riser there seemed to be very little heat radiating from the bell.  This reminded me back when I tried to have a long 3inch diameter metal riser and an extended bel on the original  Mark II l. I shortened the riser and the bell on the Mark II to what you see in the previous pictures.  So, sadly, it appears that there is a maximum riser height to surface area relationship that I have yet to discover. Next modification will be to decrease the height of the ceramic riser by 12" and the bell housing the same amount and see if going to a 4" ceramic riser makes a difference, all other parameters being the same.  That means a lot of refabricating so it may be a month or so before I get this reengineering done.  The old Mark II will continue to heat  our home unmodified.

Take care. Be Safe.
1 week ago
Hello Everyone!  

the details of my absence from my ongoing posts are inconsequential ; very well where do I begin....

First, thank you for your patience. My job on the road has prevented me from tinkering with the Mark II during the summer so a retrofit/ autopsy was not attempted as it is still in commission keeping us comfortable in our home. Believe me ! I want to see what is going on in this heater to confirm what is going on with the ceramic riser coating and all but wifey wants a warm house during our cold damp fall and so be it!  

Of course that can only mean one thing... Yes I am happy to announce that a Mark III is under construction and over the next few days, fingers crossed, should be completed and replacing the old Mark II which will then be examined under the relentless appetite my grinders cutting wheel.

Secondly, I would like to thank all of you here at Permies for viewing this post over 2200 times!  I’m certain that 50 or so can be attributed to me with edits and clarifications, but it does confirm that there is an interest in a  pellet fed rocket heater that is a little different than what seems to be norm in rocket heaters on this site.

Finally, I tend not to take as many photos as most people like but please bear with me on this. Construction of a RMH is a personal fabrication and tends to change on a budget, design consideration, material availability and a plethora of other things. So please, don’t nail me to the proverbial cross when you read below and you see something that is incongruous with above design wants and considerations. I am posting all my successes and failures so someone else can look at this and hopefully build a better version of what I have and keep themselves and others warm in their home.

So without further adieu, I introduce the Mark III almost complete .... but first, this tiny ad. Just kidding!  Lol always wanted to put that in a post.

A brief explanation of what actually changed from the Mark II and what remains the same

What remains the same....
2 x 100 lb. propane tanks for the low footprint but increased height for more surface area and increased riser height.
The horizontal flame tube (3” heavy wall square iron) remains so the smaller burner tube can easily be removed/ replaced as it does erode under the extreme heat and yes, I’m still working with the original burner assembly from the “Frankenstove “ era (I’m using it for testing and will post the new burner assembly in another post later) I have learned that it is wise to change only a couple of variables at a time.

What has changed in the Mark III  construction ...

The Ceramic Tube Risers have finally been used!
The use of high heat refractory material such as perlite, silica sand and home made water glass as the adhesive material. Caution ⚠️ making water glass involves nasty chemicals and extreme caution so be careful; that’s all I’m saying on that.

The shape of the secondary air / ash drop has been changed to a conical shape that allows ash to drop into the base of the stove and yet allow combustion air to travel up the riser at the same time. Two birds ...

Increased riser diameter from 3” to 4” and increased riser height from 33” to 45”

The increases in riser height and diameter is expected to improve ease of lighting and draft within the heater.

Here is the build so far
1 week ago
Hello Glenn,

The original use for these tubes are for refractory burners and casting liquid molten metals. My error was to place them on an established super hot burner without allowing them to acclimate to the immediate intense heat.

When I retrofit my Mark II  I will attach the lengths together with an thermal silicone (just to have the pipes align and place then in as the riser. After that, I will take a 6” or 8” sheet metal pile and center it around the ceramic riser. I will tamp vermiculite down the gap to insulate and hold the riser in place. If these riser tubes manage to crack ( which I doubt will happen) it shouldn’t matter as they will be sealed in place. I am encouraged that the cracks were in the direction of the exhaust flow. I am certain that once properly installed they will operate perfectly.

However, all this is on hold as this damp spring weather on the west coast continues to keep Mark II in operation status flooding our home with inexpensive and comfortable warmth.

Stay tuned for the retrofit

5 months ago
Ok everyone!  I rigged my makeshift rocket stove to test my new ceramic tubes and honestly, I’m at a bit saddened to admit I ruined two ceramic tubes
Firstly, let me explain what my makeshift rocket stove is all about. I got a hold of two drums from a transport tractor and stacked them on each other, end to end such that there is a large chamber that makes up a confined fire chamber. On the bottom of this chamber I have a stainless steel grilling pan that has 3/8” holes punched through out it that holds the burning coals yet provides combustion air from the bottom. On top of these two brake drums is a disk brake rotor upon which I placed three 4” x 12 ceramic tubes to act as the riser. View the pic to see the setup. I had the fire rocking and added the three tubes on top on the brake rotor. After 20 minutes I heard an odd “pop” and noticed that the bottom two tubes cracked along the length of the tube. See pic. I’m under the assumption that the ceramic tubes were heated too rapidly and cracked due to uneven thermal expansion.  Tomorrow I will try a slower heat by not putting the tubes on top of an already fully heated and rocking stove to allow the tubes to acclimate to the heat. Stay tuned.
Oh, Higher Power, please grant me patience immediately!
5 months ago
Hello Thomas,

I will post the progress of the retrofit. In the meantime, here is a screenshot of the US distributor. The Western Canada Distributors for this product is: www.oclim.com. Here in Canada, we can only purchase 3” or 4” I.D. by 12” lengths. The 4” pieces weigh about 8 pounds each. They are fragile so I imagine that shipping would be quite pricey. Therefore, I would encourage anyone that wishes to purchase these tubes to call the distributor directly to find where they can purchase these tubes locally.
5 months ago
Well my fellow Permies.... I bit the bullet and purchased some Ceramic Tubes to retrofit my Mark II Rocket Stove that has a 3" metal riser that has been coated with a ceramic spray listed above. I finally tracked down a distributor of Ceramic Tubes out here on the West Coast of  Canada! Yay..... But, the company had a minimum $100 order.  My present riser is approximately 36" so you can understand my distain to have to purchase 9 of these 12" tubes to make minimum order but sometimes you have to spend the money to do the job right the second time.  Besides the Ceramic Exhaust Spray was over $30 as a stop gap so now I will have a  riser that is 77% larger in diameter surface area and will probably give a better draught and make lighting easier and generate more heat for my current design. Again I will keep you all posted and probably do a semi autopsy of the Mark II when I cut the bell out to remove the steel pipe riser. Here is a pic the Ceramic Tubes I purchased.
5 months ago
So here is an update on my new ceramic coated metal riser.  It appears that the running temperature at the top of my heat bell is around 550 F with my secondary temp 6" below the bell is 400 F. This results in an extra 50 F increase in operating temperatures which seems to suggest that more heat is climbing the riser and not being transmitted to the riser itself.  I am happy with this result as it means the ceramic spray is helping protect the metal riser and making available more heat to be dissipated by the heat bell. So it is a win on two sides -  more heat delivered to the heat bell and less heat being absorbed by the metal riser.  I will acknowledge, however, that it would be wise to have a ceramic riser in the first place and this coating material is a "quick fix" on an engineering error in the first place. It will solve the problem for the short term and give me an excuse to build a "Mark III" in the future; but let's make it thru this winter / spring and save some money heating out home with the pellet fed rocket stove and learn from our mistakes in a warm house.  I"m not sure when I will be able to build the "Mark III", but I can assure you that it will begin with an autopsy of the "Mark II" - just like the Frankenstove!
8 months ago
Hello Permies!  It has been a while since I posted news about my Mark II and here is a quick update.  I managed to find the elusive ceramic spray that I mentioned earlier in a post to prevent metal riser deterioration. I found this spray at a local tool store and managed to buy the last can and got 2 spray nozzles as an added bouus!!  So you can get the stuff in Canada without having to pay $47 in shipping.  Anyways, I began the coating process by submersing the two hoses in boiling water and then straightened them out by pulling on each end and running under cold water.  I cut one tube and removed the brass nozzle from one of the spray cans and joined the two hoses together so it would be long enough to insert down the entire riser from the 3/4" threaded hole in the top of my heater bell.  I generously coated the 3" riser with the internal exhaust coating and let dry for the recommended 24 hours.  I also added a 6" extension to my secondary air addition port which is directly below the burn chamber.  I sealed the pipe in place by using some "Steel Stick" epoxy material to hold the 6" nipple inside the threaded 1.25 threaded pipe. By doing this I can still adjust the inlet air from the bottom of the threaded fitting.  Also when it is necessary to empty the fly ash from the burn chamber I just have to unscrew this fitting and any ash just falls out. Here is a picture of the two mods I have done.
8 months ago