Windy Huaman

+ Follow
since Sep 18, 2018
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
1
In last 30 days
1
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
4
Received in last 30 days
3
Total given
2
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand First Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Windy Huaman

Dillon Nichols wrote:I know nothing about any of these fish, or Peru, and not that much about aquaponics...

But.

That feed cost is insane by my standards. My experience is with hog and chicken feed. This stuff is expensive here, compared to more agricultural parts of Canada not located on an island far from grain country, and VERY expensive compared to the USA.

And yet a metric ton of feed costs me, a small farmer with zero bargaining power, around $670. 67 cents a kilogram, Canadian dollars, around 48 cents USD.


It seems clear that anyone selling those fish for the price you describe is either using a much more economical feed, or is being heavily subsidized in some way. Or, they are not selling at that price; I wonder what that fish is worth somewhere else?


In my region, successful fish farms are generally biggish. There is a lot of economy of scale to be leveraged. Aquaponics on a modest scale may have more profit potential from the produce side.. at least, that would be my guess for my region. In that case, a slow growing but cheap to feed fish might make sense despite the lower market value.



Is the feed you mention at $670 a metric ton made with 100% certified organic ingredients?
1 day ago

Bryant RedHawk wrote:

Steve Mendez wrote:I have done a bit of research on commercial eel culture. Yes, there are profitable eel farms. They are a much sought after food item in several countries.
I haven't found any instance where they are spawned in captivity. Somebody may be doing it and they are keeping quiet about it. I wouldn't blame them, elvers or glass eels or baby eels are one of the most high dollar aquatic animals there are.
Eels are a catadromous species meaning that they migrate down rivers to spawn in the sea, as opposed to anadromous species that migrate from the sea up the rivers to spawn (salmon). Anadromous fish are routinely spawned by people for commercial purposes, catadromous species not so much.
This means that baby eels must be captured as they migrate up the rivers and then sold to eel farmers for grow-out. Some states have a glass eel season. They are tiny and see through, thus glass eels.
I have no problem with this practice as long as their capture is controlled and regulated by qualified Biologists.



I recently heard that there is a small consortium of eel men in Northern Japan that are trying to build a method of spawning eels.
Now whether or not it comes to pass is another story, but they apparently have two marine biologist working with them so we can hope that this happens, that would take pressure off the wild eels.
(On the other hand, if they fail and give up (very unlikely) that might be something to start working on here in the states then sell the technology and equipment to Japan and other countries)

Redhawk



Very cool. Well I've been learning that in Peru, the two eels aren't actually eels. There's Synbranchus marmoratus http://www.fishbase.se/summary/Synbranchus-marmoratus
Which has a population doubling time of 14 years.

And of course there's the electric eel, Electrophorus electricus. The latter is extremely dangerous to handle, and neither of them have been studied at all from an aquaculture point of view.
2 days ago

Tereza Okava wrote:I used to translate a lot of research in the area of fish farming, most about what could be added to fish chow in order to produce better results more cheaply (off the top of my head I can think of studies on using orange peels, crab shells, and grain mill waste over the past year or three), which indicates you're not the only one wondering how costs can be cut.
The studies didn't specifically address Arapaima (they're also in my region, here we call them pirarucu) but if I recall they are fast growers and get BIG, and i imagine they do have very specific nutritional needs because they grow so large and so fast. I imagine you've already seen it in your research, but the FAO has a nice factsheet about farming pirarucu, and a major stumbling block for farming these fish is reproduction. If you haven't read it yet, you might find this interesting. http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Arapaima_gigas/en



Yes, I've seen it. You're right about the stumbling block. I was looking at a published project from a company in Ucayali department in Peru.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjjxe_L17ngAhXrrVQKHcI3Cb0QFjAAegQIABAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aquahoy.com%2Fen%2Fdownload%2Fcategory%2F3-informes%3Fdownload%3D11%3Adesarrollo-de-la-tecnologia-en-la-produccion-intensiva-de-paiche-arapaima-gigas-mediante-la-utilizacion-de-tanques-circulares-en-la-fase-de-engorde&usg=AOvVaw0mdUOii2HeAgUzWmX4Kvsv
They used 1800 Arapaima gigas in the study (180 per tank) And even with that quantity they still paid 15 soles (about $5USD) per fingerling! They state quite openly the cost of producing one kilo of Paiche using their production model is almost 13.5 soles. Yet, I don't think they're inlcuding transportation costs. Maybe you'd sell your Paiche kilo for 23.5 soles in the market.

They did include pretty much all other costs. Their feed cost $2USD per kilo including shipping. They claim their fish were growing over 30 grams per day! That means they were using aproximately 54kg of feed per day. I've seen another study that showed 37grams/day of weight gain with Paiche. That's over 1 kilo per month. Most farmed Paiche are sold when they weigh between 10-15kg.

Since my original post, I've learned that less than a 1.5 Feed Conversion Ratio has been achieved in many different Paiche studies.

It does seem like a good choice, but as someone said earlier. Economy of scale is a factor to consider.

Can someone who is better at business than I please help me come up with a formula for determining what would be the most net income generating fish for my aquaponics situation? These are the main factors I would consider:

1)Price for one fingerling
2)Price per kilo of feed
3)Grams per day of growth
4)Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)
5)Sale price of one kilo of harvested fish
6)Labor costs to care for and harvest fish

I think these are the core variables that could help one determine the right fish for their system. But how to crunch the numbers into some sort of math formula to get a numerical rating for each species is a mystery to me.

Oh and I do understand that the plants are by far the main source of income in aquaponics, but you also want to make sure you're profiting from the fish as well.

2 days ago
I've been doing a little reading recently.

I was interested in the production of Paiche (Arapaima gigas) which is a native species in my part of the world. I want to do aquaponics...not aquaculture.

I was researching different native fish that I could use. Piaractus brachypomus and Colossoma macropomum were the other two candidates. Okay, so, at best these latter two can only grow slightly over a kilogram per year.
Then I read about Paiche and the choice seemed obvious. The thing can grow 10-15kg in a year... even during its first year. The meat is worth twice as much as the other two fish when purchased by the kilogram. It was a clear winner...

But then I read a little bit more. A very important consideration is the Food Conversion Rate aka Indice de Conversion alimenticia aparente in Spanish. I read a lot of scientific articles about these three species of fish, and each one was slightly different in each study. A Food Conversion Rate of 1.0 is excellent. It would mean for every 1kg of fish food supplied, the fish would grow 1kg of weight. I think that's unheard of in nature, but some of the studies showed the Piaractus and Colossoma as low as 1.19. Actually pretty much in all studies these species' food conversion was less than 1.5. As for Paiche, I could find few studies suggesting less than 2.0 was possible. Most seemed to agree that 2.5, 3.0 and even over 4.0 was to be expected of that carnivorous species.

An FAO article shows that paiche can achieve a food conversion rate of 2.0 with a specially designed feed in Peru that costs $2usd per kilogram. This feed suggests it will achieve a food conversion rate of 1.8 at best and 2.0 at worst.

I did some number crunching. If we chose 2.0 as our figure. To produce one 20kg Paiche we would require 40kg of this feed. At $2 per kilo the total feed investment for this one fish that is $80. 50-55% of the Paiche is filet. So that is 10kg of filet. A one kilogram filet of Paiche meat is only worth about $8USD in Peru, which would mean that one fish only makes you $80. (I.e. It is only enough to recuperate the feed cost...not to mention the other expenses.)

I'd like to know how people are actually making a profit by raising such fish. It just doesn't seem like a sure business venture.
1 week ago
Eventually I want to forest raise pigs on 10 hectares in the tropics. The "orchard"/ food forest I want to integrate them into will be full of coconut, macadamia, mango and avocado as well as ice cream bean and a number of other tropical fruit species.

The problem is, I have no experience with pigs. I figured they could eat fallen fruit, but I really don't know anything about them or what damage they will cause or how to keep them from escaping.

Will invisible fence systems work?
1 week ago

Bryant RedHawk wrote:Biology and Ecology of Anguillid Eels             (This is the latest authoritative book on this subject)

1st Edition

Takaomi Arai

Available at the CRC Press  https://www.crcpress.com/Biology-and-Ecology-of-Anguillid-Eels/Arai/p/book/9781482255157  Hard back is available for 190.00, E-book is also available 52.16

While the hardback seems like a steep price, do remember that scientific books are full of full color photos and you likely won't have access to that information elsewhere. Plus today you have alternatives like the e-book and renting an e-book.
I far and away prefer to buy hardbacks for my reference library, but that is just me, and I do tend to use my library a lot.



Does this publication get into the culture of eels be it in Aquaponics or Aquaculture systems?
2 weeks ago
Oh, I forgot to mention, my plan was also to sow perennial peanut seed densely in the area immediately surrounding a planted sapling. So, it was funny that you mentioned that too. I guess that must be a proven strategy.

I can share my plant list too if you're curious. There are 6 main species (including 1000 of Schizolobium amazonicum and 2000 of Inga sp. for long term support) totalling 7000 individuals, and about another 50 species of native and exotic fruiting trees totalling another 4,000 individuals.
2 weeks ago

Joe Kern wrote:Aloha, good suggestions from everyone. One thing to consider, though is that these grasses may not be temperate-level aggressive, but tropical-level aggressive, meaning can eat you or your house and car, or at least smother your trees in a few days. It is really a different situation if you do not have experience with the crazy tropical grasses, planting trees or even just working with the land can be near impossible with certain species. Perhaps Windy can provide the species so we can get a better idea of what they are dealing with, and location information, too. The really aggressive tropical grasses can form monocultures that can resist grazing, tillage, even moving through them to an unbelievable degree. They are not like temperate grasslands that, if left alone, will become forests relatively quickly, but can maintain themselves as grassland for (in human terms)nearly forever. This was talked about a bit in the early Permaculture texts, probably because in parts of Australia the early designers were dealing with some of the really difficult grasses. This is one reason why temperate-style ranching has been so devastating for tropical forests, because when forest is cleared for pasture, if it is later abandoned, it does not quickly and easily revert back to woodland, but requires active intervention to get out of the grass cycle. Extremely overgrazed areas are actually easier to deal with in some ways, because the aggressive grasses are usually gone by then. There is a difference between knee or waist high tropical grass and the 15ʻ+ tall grass monoculture with 1-2" thick stems, saw-bladed leaves and itchy hairs that we very often deal with in Hawaiʻi. I am only bringing this up to say that it may not be as simple as planting trees and watching them grow, because I deal with the opposite all the time. The grasses we deal with almost always need to be cleared mechanically first, whether with hand tools up to large equipment. Not that I would recommend them, but herbicides are generally not effective unless sprayed from the air, or along the edges over a long period of time, just because no one can walk through them to spray.

One thing I have learned is that if you do any kind of clearing, you must have a plan to occupy all of the cleared space with desirable plants immediately, and maintain your cleared area somehow until they get established, or you will lose your cleared ground and your plants very quickly.

Many of the grasses are rhizomatous, and can propagate themselves from small pieces of stem, so it is not just above ground but below that you need to consider. A big tractor with a flail mower is a great tool to cut lanes in the grass, many people opt for a bull dozer here too, and it is not a bad idea with some grasses. If you can clear wide lanes that you can mow or maintain somehow, you can start a nucleus of desirable vegetation that can cope with the grass, but I would not say that it is something you can plant and walk away from. Any kind of tillage is usually impossible with the grasses I deal with regularly, because they sprout from the stems and are usually too big, tough and woody for anything I know to deal with. After the grass is mulched (2-3 passes with a flail mower) and broken down, some tillage is possible, but that has its own problems in the tropics, usually resulting in lost fertility. By the time the grass breaks down enough to till in, the rest has usually grown back too tall to deal with anyway. I find it works to figure out your guild or companions that will go with each tree and plant everything at once. Perrenial peanut is a good low cover for right around a tree, and pigeon pea and crotalaria species further out. Comfrey grows in the tropics, and it and vetiver can work for a barrier to rhizomes if planted thickly. Plant everything extra thick and cut any extra down later for mulch if it is in the way of your desired tree. If you can fill a 10ʻ circle around your tree with good plants and keep the aggressive grasses out, your trees have a fighting shot at surviving. We also use the kukui tree Aleurites moluccana to take up space when needed. If that is available where you are, it grows fast, provides useful products and lots of mulch, breaks down fast and is easy to cut down and replace with more desirable trees, although it is also desirable in its own right.

Cattle can deal with some of the worst grasses, and goats can eat the stems, but with really tall, thick grass, intensive grazing is difficult. Equipment can make lanes in the grass for access and fencing, to make it easier, but this would not be a quick way to establish a forest. Most people seem to opt for extensive grazing over a very long time, after which the fertility is largely gone anyway and the land will be overgrazed, plus in that kind of management cattle and goats would surely find any trees and eat them too.

I have attached a couple pictures of what I deal with that may give some idea of what grass in the tropics can look like, they are not the most illustrative, but are what I have available right now.

You have your work cut out for you if you opt for a parcel of that size, even a few acres of the really aggressive grasses can be hard work to establish trees in!

I think this lengthy reply may help some that do not have as much experience with tropical landscapes understand how it is different from temperate, and how much more challenging it can be. The title of the post is worth a book or two in and of itself, as well as a lifetime of work for many of us. I think it is worth a lot of discussion, not just for the original poster, but for the entire world at large, based on the impact it could have on the worlds ecosystem.



Thank you, Joe. You really hit the nail on the head in terms of what I was thinking for an approach. I don't have an exact property in mind. I'm looking anywhere from the high jungle areas of central-northern Peru in areas that are about 1000m elevation (suitable for mountain species as well as species from the lower jungles).

Actually properties I've seen with cattle in the region have never had grass that tall. I suppose because they're actively maintained. I suppose it's possible to have grasses as tall and robust as yours. I'm not familiar with grass species and their identification.

The focus of my question is what initial mechanical disturbance to use to get ahead of the grasses and give the trees a fighting chance? I haven't found any good resources to learn about this, so lately I've been considering instead looking for land with bushy secondary/third/fourth forest regrowth.

My approach in that situation would be a D6 dozer with root rake blade, an excavator with thumb attachment, and large tree chipper. The process here is pretty self-explanatory, but I'd leave a few large and/or dead trees on each hectare for bird habitat and to help repair the nutrient cycle.

When the land is cleared we'd pass through with a tractor with auger attachment and dig small holes roughly every 2m with about 2.5m between rows (I still need to work out the exact math on this when I know the exact area of land and the exact number of specimen trees (the contract states there will be somewhere in the ballpark of 10,000 - 11,000 saplings).

Before the tractor is preparing planting holes, 12 metric tons of compost and 12 metric tons of cow manure will be spread around the area. The tractor will first make a pass with a subsoiler implement, and then another pass with the auger to drill planting holes. At some point during this process, we will simultaneously broadcast a mixture of Cajanus cajan (Pigeon Pea), Ricinus communis, Moringa oleifera, Leucaena leucocephala, and some sort of summer annual bush bean.

This seed mixture will be applied at a higher density than what is conventional. For example, Pigeon Pea seed alone will be applied at a rate of 10kg/Ha.

As you can see, this venture has kept me awake at night.

I still have more to learn, and that's why I want to know how to establish trees into an area that's been tropical pasture for at least the past couple years.

Using the above method I outlined to clear regrowth forest, the machine and labor costs will total from $16,540 - $22,740 depending on if I rent everything and buy my own fuel and hire the operators myself or if I just use a contractor to take care of the job.

That's a significant cost, but I'm confident the results would be excellent with minimal subsequent interference from undesirable plants including grasses.

I know costs would be less to convert pasture, but I'm not sure what the approach for this is. As you've pointed out, it's paramount to prepare the site in such a way as to avoid the re-encroachment of the grasses.

I think you are wise to point out out that the approach isn't the same as in more temperate areas.
2 weeks ago
Just wondering if it's feasible to raise them in Aquaponics. Couldn't you simulate ocean water for fingerling production?
2 weeks ago

Borislav Iliev wrote:Dont kill them, just cut them low, plant your trees next to them, and every time the old trees try to grow just cut them low again and use that growth to mulch around your trees, if your trees are fine enough they will make a good shade and will suppress the growth of these old trees eventually, or plant some bushes to even further shade them. As long as the old trees are low but still growing then you can use that as an indicator how well you are utilizing sun energy, the moment they give up because of the shading, then you will know you have done it right, till then use them to improve your soil.(this may not be the right way for you though, if you dont have time for that)



This is probably what I'm going to do, as I don't really want to spend any money renting a stump grinder.

I did that to another Tipu tree a couple years ago, and there were only ever a couple shoots that I stripped off a few months afterwards. Nothing  more has sprouted from the stump since then, which actually surprises me quite a bit, because I assumed this species was a lot more tenacious.

FWIW, I plan to plant saplings of Aristotelia chilensis next to the Tipu stumps. I hope the other Tipu stumps turn out ti be as weak as the other even though the remaining Tipus are considerably bigger.
3 weeks ago