Jim Reiland

I'll add that blown-in cellulose is also an excellent nearly-natural choice for wall cavity insulation.  Like the other mostly-natural insulations--cotton, wool, hemp wool and blown-in chopped straw (which is currently available only in Europe), cellulose is treated to resist decomposition and flame spread.  It has a very low embodied energy (which means that not much energy was used to create it) and makes use of a waste product (newsprint and other waste paper).  It also offers outstanding insulation comparable to the batt insulations listed here, and also helps to resist air movement between interior and exterior wall surfaces.  

I have applied an interior wood lath and clay plaster over blown-in cellulose on several projects--the combination offers outstanding insulation and distributed thermal mass.

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Good on you Matt for thinking about making an older building better!  Most of us who use more natural building materials to make energy efficient buildings have focused on new construction, but there's a much larger opportunity in renovation and remodel work in the U.S.  Housing stock in our country is "replaced" at the glacially slow pace of between 1% and 2% each year.  If we're to make all of our buildings more energy efficient as quickly as possible we can't wait 100 years for all of the existing stock to be replaced--we need to make older buildings better, and we could do it with more natural building materials.

I think using light-straw-clay for insulation in your exterior walls isn't a great idea.  At 12" thick LSC has a resistance to heat flow of only R-21, which may not be adequate for your location.  Apart from being quite heavy (15 lbs. to 20 lbs. per cubic foot), a 12" wall thickness would require a second sill plate interior of the existing one, which places much of that weight over flooring that may not be supported by either a thickened slab or floor joist.  If you're working over a basement or crawl space you may be able to remedy that.  In any case, assuming the existing building's walls are made with 2x4 or 2x6 studs, you'd be losing some interior floor space to thicker walls.  Just filling the existing 2x stud bays with LSC gets you to less than 1/3 or 1/2 of R-21.  

Although not completely "natural," you might consider hemp wool, sheep's wool, or cotton batt insulation. They are all comparable to fiberglass and rockwool (R-3 to R-4 per inch of thickness) but made with much more natural and lower embodied energy fibers treated to resist burning.  All are available in batt form as cavity insulation like rockwool or fiberglass.
 
To bump your wall insulation consider these three options:  

(1) a Larsen wall truss attached (cantilevered) to the exterior walls that functions like a sweater, wrapping the building's body in an additional layer of insulation. This gives you two separate but attached insulated stud walls. Use the hemp wool, cotton, or sheep wool insulation in the stud bays and sheath with siding appropriate to your area. You may need to remount windows and doors into the new exterior wall plane or fuss with exterior sills, reveals, and soffits so the windows and doors are inset into the exterior wall surface--it's a cool look and reduces wind washing (heat loss from air movement against the window surface).

(2) a wood fiber board wrap of the entire building. Many building codes in cold climates now require an R-21 + 5 wall insulation achieved by standard 2x6 wall cavities filled with fiberglass or similar, sheathed with plywood or OSB, then covered with 1" of rigid foam board (R-5 per inch).  A more natural alternative to the foam is wood fiber board like Gutex.  Though it's considerably thicker at 2 1/2", wood fiber panels are still vapor open so moisture can move out of the wall assembly towards the exterior.  Insulating wood fiber panels are very common in Europe and have been available in the U.S. for the last decade or so, but can be hard to find locally.  Similar challenges and benefits as mentioned above when it comes to remounting the windows/doors or dealing with exterior window reveals, sills, soffits, etc.

(3) an offset stud wall to the interior of the existing wall.  Leave the windows and doors as they are mounted on the exterior sheathing (assuming you're not going to replace them) and add an interior sill plate and top plate to the inside of the existing one, place 2x studs offset from existing.  Move electrical boxes to the new interior walls (may need to change box locations and heights as you'll be limited by how the slack in the original cables running to the boxes, and as mentioned above, adjust the box depth for whatever interior finish you're planning to use.  Note that there are adjustable depth electric boxes, but they cost more than regular boxes.  Fill both stud wall bays with whatever mostly-natural batt insulation you like. The offset eliminates thermal bridging, and the extra insulation thickness can double the wall's R-value. But the cost is reduced interior space and some fussing with the new, deeper interior sills, soffits and reveals for windows and doors. Assuming your exterior sheathing (plywood or OSB) is in good shape, use whatever exterior siding is appropriate to your area.  

I like the interior lath and plaster option because it gives you a distributed interior thermal mass--more material to absorb and release heat so you have a more stable interior temperature.  Clay plasters are probably the easiest to work with, and with baseboards installed through the house (and chair rails in the dining area) can be very durable.  In any case, clay plasters are very easy to repair.  Note that the weight of a 1" thick plastered wall is around 15 lbs. per square foot (1/2" sheetrock weighs  a lot less at 1.6 lbs. per square foot!).  If you have a crawlspace or basement you may need to reinforce the floor under the new interior wall so it can support the extra weight.

Eves. Some years ago Fine Homebuilding magazine published an article that described construction features that helped ensure building longevity--sufficient roof overhangs was at or near the top of the list.  The roof overhangs on all of the strawbale or LSC projects I worked on here in S. Oregon and N. California had roof overhangs of at least 2'.  I think you can afford to go with less if the exterior siding system you use has a proper rainscreen (air gap between the sheathing and the siding).

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Correction. I should have said that "DIY homeowners and builders aren't constrained so long as they are using approved building materials and methods." The building code has a provision for alternative construction methods and materials, but it requires permit applicants to demonstrate that what they want to do meets minimum code requirements.  When this concerns structural design the building plans must be reviewed by a structural engineer.  If other novel materials or methods are being proposed there's probably some other requirement, like submitting thermal or fire-resistance test results.  It can be onerous, but I think understandable.

For example, if you wanted to substitute cattail fluff for more conventional wall insulation because they are more natural and locally abundant, you may need to demonstrate that they aren't flammable, and that the cavity depth of fluff meets your region's requirements (e.g. R-21).  

Jim
Many Hands Builders

I think Ned’s post raises an important issue—could more natural wall assemblies be more future-flexible?

With few exceptions, most buildings—whether made of conventional or “more natural” materials--have foundations, roofs, windows, doors, plumbing, electrical, and a heating, cooling, and ventilation system of some sort (ranging from very complicated to very simple).

When I think of flexibility, modular wall assembly features could play a role.  Standard sizes of a wall panel (think Legos) can be arranged in a sort of plug-and-play fashion to create permanent structures, and with some foresight these buildings could more easily be expanded using the same kind of modular wall panels.  

Wall panels made of modern conventional building materials like OSB or plywood sheathing, wood or metal studs, and fiberglass, foam in spray or board form, or rockwool insulation are already available.  Some have chases routed into them to facilitate electrical or plumbing.

But these wall assemblies could also be made with more natural materials like straw or hemp wool insulation combined with wood 2x and plywood for structure.  Pre-fabricated panelized straw bale wall systems are already well-developed in Europe (research ModCel or Ecococon), and similar systems are emerging in N. America. These are factory built walls transported to a job site, craned into position, roofed, wired, and plumbed in just days.  I wouldn’t be surprised to learn of efforts to create modular wall assemblies using other more natural insulations like hemp wool or blown-in-straw instead to replace fiberglass or foam.

Future-flexibility also involves the careful design of structures to anticipate future changes in terms of space additions, or upgrading electrical or plumbing.  As mentioned by others on this thread, access through open attics and/or crawlspaces reduces demolition and disruption, as would chair rail or baseboard chases. Carefully placing a chase or conduits in a slab or under flooring helps, too.

I sometimes worked on projects where homeowners wanted or needed to start small (e.g. 900 sq. ft) but planned to add conditioned space as their family grew, as they could afford, or as time allowed.  We placed suitable attachment points for roof ledgers in straw bale gable walls before we plastered them, and built porches with full-sized footings so when they were enclosed the footings could handle the wall weight.  We kept electrical away from the space below a window that might one day become a doorway into an addition, and tried to keep most plumbing and electrical in more accessible partition walls.  

Jeff’s problem with replacing a door seems to have a few causes—poor quality materials may be one, but poor original installation (lack of a sill pan), and poor building design (placing a doorway on a wall that receives wind-driven rain) may also play a role here. Relatively inexpensive vinyl sill pans prevent water from leaking under a doorway have replaced site-formed lead or metal sill pans, and weather exposed walls with doorways benefit from larger roof overhangs.

I can’t agree with Jeff that building codes are a joke, or about why they exist. Yes, the building codes can be frustrating and confusing. And there’s no question in my mind that the modern building material industry is behind writing most of the model codes (International Residential Code and International Building Code, to name a few applicable in the United States) that various building authorities adopt, and that they almost certainly have a thumb on the scale during code review and approval hearings.

But we don’t need to throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to building codes.

Properly understood, building codes represent the minimum legally required standard to which structures can be built. Codes have changed over time as new materials, construction methods, and our understanding of building science has changed. For a brief history of how and why building codes developed see Glenn Mathewson’s article in Fine Homebuilding Magazine, July 2023. https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2023/07/19/a-history-of-u-s-building-codes

Builders—whether DIY homeowners or contractors--are not in any way prevented from exceeding the building code when it comes to using higher quality materials, employing more labor-intensive methods in construction, or aiming for improved building performance, longevity, or occupant health.  When they do so—as they usually do when building an energy efficient straw bale, straw-clay, hemp-crete, or any other code-level mostly natural material structure—they are probably exceeding the building code’s minimum requirements in many ways.  

Members of the California Straw Building Association, along with others, have volunteered thousands of hours to the effort of producing model building codes for straw bale, light-straw-clay, and cob (monolithic adobe) construction, and had a hand in writing the hempcrete and Tiny House building codes.  Each code took years of effort to write and pass through the code approval process so they’d be available for builders and DIY homeowners alike. They are in the IRC as appendices: AS (Strawbale Construction), AR (Light Straw-Clay Construction), AQ (Tiny House), AU (Cob), and BA (Hemp-Lime).  Many states, including Oregon, have adopted some or most of these codes.  

Those of us trying to promote natural building to a wider audience (because it’s healthier for people, local economies, the planet, and more) realized that we could remain outside the system and complain about it, or we could try to change it from within.  In my view, we made the right choice because we are removing barriers to building with more natural materials.  In any recent year there may have been as many as a few thousand permitted homes and commercial buildings made with natural materials like strawbale, straw-clay, hemp wool, hempcrete, etc. in that year. This represents a tiny fraction of the approximately one-million homes built in the United States each year.  

If we want to help more people build with natural materials—if we want to shift that less-than-1% to 10%, or 20% or more, then we need to make it easier. Having building codes helps.

Jim
Many Hands Builders

The short answer is yes, we should avoid placing impermeable materials against wall assemblies made with materials like straw bale, straw-clay, etc., unless we provide other means for moisture to escape. The only difference of opinion that I’m aware of is whether some materials or combinations of materials are vapor permeable enough for a particular climate. My earlier mention of plywood sheathing may be the source of your question about impermeable materials?  

In natural building “best practice” is to design wall assemblies that allow moisture to escape. However, that depends on how much and in what form moisture can be expected to enter the walls, as-well-as the materials in the wall assembly itself. That’s why “best practice” can take on a regional quality—what works in arid Nevada may work not as well in humid and wet Florida; what works in mild coastal California may not work in frigid Vermont.

My experience is almost exclusively with straw-based insulation materials covered on both sides with vapor permeable plasters—clay and/or lime. A fairly recent development in straw bale construction has been to use clay plasters on the interior and ½” or 3/8” plywood sheathing on the exterior with a vapor permeable plaster or some other siding over the plywood sheathing.

Much of western-central Oregon south through central California presents a climate suitable for this system, at least according to the materials modeling done by members of the California Straw Building Association. Buildings in Eugene, Ashland, and Jacksonville, OR and Vallejo and Lake Tahoe, CA have employed this wall assembly. This analysis, called a WUFI (an acronym for the German words ”wärme und feuchte instationär”) shows how heat and moisture move through different materials of a wall assembly given varying climate conditions. Regions with mild winters and warm dry summers are well suited to this kind of wall assembly as this thickness of plywood is vapor permeable enough to not trap moisture. The wall assembly is more permeable if whatever siding system that covers the plywood—metal, cement board, wood, or plaster—has an air-gap.

When I replastered my straw bale house last year I used this method.  After removing the existing plaster I let 2x4 studs into the bales (which had been laid flat many years ago so no strings were cut) on 2’ centers. I gang-drilled ½” holes on 12” centers through the stacks of the 3/8” plywood panels that sheath the straw bale walls. On my project the plywood isn’t structural—it’s there to support the conventional plaster regime, i.e. a 2-ply building paper/drain mat stapled to the plywood, lath stapled to the 2x studs the plywood attaches to, and a three-coat lime plaster built out to 1” thickness.  

I’m guessing that the ½” holes (that total 4.2 square inches per 4’ x 8’ plywood panel) increases vapor permeance; I haven’t seen tests to confirm that. If the plywood were part of the building’s shear it’s also unknown whether holes of that size and location in the plywood would compromise any structural function. Still, it’s a promising system as most builders and building code officials are familiar with plywood sheathed stud walls, and any kind of siding can cover the sheathing, both lowering costs and increasing aesthetic options.

A longer explanation of vapor permeability might begin with the question “how does moisture get into walls?”

For another time?

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Hi Emily,

Thanks for the clarifications.  Either wall system should be protected from wind-driven rain by either or both adequate roof overhangs and a suitable plaster.  

Note that both straw-clay and hempcrete could be plastered, but they could also be sided if you were concerned about wind-driven rain. (Addendum. Straw bale walls can also be sided, but it's best if the exterior bale surface is plastered first. At the very least a scratch coat provides an air barrier, resists fire, insects, and rodents. Adding a brown coat is better as it supplies a better air barrier.  Adding siding to a straw bale wall requires some planning. One method is to let 2x ledgers or posts into the bales on whatever centers the siding requires, usually 2', and make a note of where they are.  Once the plaster covers the wall secure furring strips through the plaster to the ledgers or posts, then secure the siding to the furring strips. This results in a "proper" rain screen with an air gap (the thickness of the furring strips).  When stacking the bales against plywood sheathing--a wall system that works great in some climates plastering the exterior isn't possible, and may not be critical as the plywood takes on some of the function of the plaster.  Add siding to the exterior surface of the plywood according to your area's best practice. Rain screens are a great practice, but may not be absolutely necessary in some climates.  Be sure to install insect screen at the top and bottom of the wall so it's not an open space for critters to occupy.)

Clay plasters are lower cost and user friendly but can erode from the wall if hit by too much rain.  Sealing them with some silicate based product or linseed oil helps, but also makes it difficult to fix as a repair plaster won't stick as easily to the treated plaster.  

Lime plasters are more durable but they aren't water repellent so much as water reservoirs. In natural wall assemblies like straw bale, straw-clay, or hempcrete walls exterior plasters  function to absorb liquid moisture (wind-driven rain), then release it as water vapor. This mechanism can fail if there's too much rain and not enough dry time between rainfall events. When that happens the water soaks into whatever substrate the plaster is on--straw bales, straw clay, hempcrete--where it stays until exterior conditions pull the moisture back out in the form of water vapor.

How long that takes depends on exterior conditions--warm and dry summer weather is best for evaporating water from the walls, though very cold winter conditions help to prevent microbes from becoming active. I have seen straw bale and straw-clay walls that were wet on the exterior surface survive for months in S. Oregon winters without apparent damage because it was too cold for the microbes to start eating. Some of the repair work I did on straw bale structures in S. Oregon involved only the lower few feet of the wall where the plaster absorbed liquid water from rain splash and roofs without gutters.  

It costs more, but larger overhangs protect walls better.

RE your comment about "adequate dry time." The handed-down wisdom in the straw-clay building world of "one week of dry time per 1" of wall thickness" really depends on optimal drying conditions.  I have tested straw-clay walls many months after they were placed and found readings well over 20% moisture content.  It's possible that the measuring tools we use (moisture reading equipment designed for hay) isn't appropriate for a material like straw-clay, but lacking other reliable methods to evaluate the interior of a straw-clay wall we waited for the wall moisture content to come down before plastering either side. We began exterior plasters nine months after the walls were placed, and completed the interior plasters almost a year after the straw-clay was placed.  We also didn't rely entirely on warm, dry weather to coax moisture from the walls. Over the winter the owner used a wood burning stove to raise the interior temperatures, and also ran dehumidifiers.

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Hi Scott,

Sorry for the long delay--a nearby wild fire has kept my attention!  

RE the book Light Straw Clay Essentials, you might be thinking of my friend and colleague Lydia Doleman, who wrote that book. I contributed only encouragement and a few pictures.

As for expertise, I have worked with different kinds of lime plasters and have lots of thoughts on how to apply them to straw bale and light-straw-clay walls, and also conventionally sheathed buildings. Still, I wouldn’t describe myself as an expert on lime plasters—plenty of people have much more experience.

My understanding is that all the lime plasters—the “hydrated” limes like naturally hydraulic limes (NHL), straight Type-S lime, and artificially hydraulic limes (AHL) like Type-S with a pozzolan added—all benefit from damp curing.

Some years ago I read Building With Lime: A Practical Introduction by Stafford Holmes and Michael Wingate, a couple of UK based experts on using lime in building.  On page 125 of their book, in a chapter about lime renders (plasters) and why they fail, they write:

“Carbonation and chemical reactions that give final strength take place best in moist and warm conditions that dry out slowly.”  

There’s more to this—conditions also can’t be too hot or too humid, and of course freezing is going to cause problems, too. My understanding has been that limes carbonate best when temperatures are between 45 degrees and 85 degrees Fahrenheit. Too hot or too cold, and the carbonation process shuts down.

To your specific question RE damp curing a Type-S lime plaster. Yes, I recommend damp curing, if for no other reason than I didn’t want an expensive do-over. My crew and I usually applied Type-S exterior lime plasters that were made artificially hydraulic by adding a ¼ part metakaolin (a kaolin clay that has been calcined—fired at a high temperature) or pumice.  This introduces a mild hydraulic set to the Type-S, which is an “air” lime—it sets only by absorbing carbon dioxide from the air. An air lime plaster at 3/8” thickness can take several weeks to set hard enough (green hard) to support a subsequent coat, so adding something like metakaolin or pumice reduces the time between coats, and makes the plaster a bit stronger.

I have only heard of straight Type-S limes that were applied but not kept damp—never done it, nor have I tested samples to learn what might happen if a lime plaster dried out before it cured.  My guess is that it might be friable (powdery) or crumbly, but I don’t know for sure. I don’t know exactly how the chemistry works, but I understand that damp curing helps the lime—as Holmes and Wingate say—to fully carbonate (convert from either quicklime--CaO or a hydrated lime like Type-S, NHL, or AHL—Ca(OH)2 to calcium carbonate—CaCO3.

So what does it take to “damp cure” a lime plaster?  It depends.

When I have applied Type-S or NHL limes to interiors where it was relatively easy to control both temperature and humidity I have often been able to just let the plaster set without adding moisture to keep it damp.  On a few jobs I misted (not hosed!) the walls once or twice during the entire five-to-seven day curing time recommended both by manufacturers and application guidance found in lots of places—books, on-line, etc.

If we applied any of the limes to exteriors during cool, overcast, calm, and drizzly days that were expected to last for the week-long-curing period we didn’t need to supplement with daily misting because the weather conditions didn’t favor rapid drying.

Unfortunately, here in S. Oregon the building schedule often had us applying exterior lime plasters when conditions were hot, dry, and windy (e.g., 90 degrees Fahrenheit, 20% humidity, 30mph winds). Under those conditions moisture in the wet plaster would evaporate quickly, well before the lime had time to cure, so we intervened to keep the plaster damp. Sometimes misting once-a-day sufficed. I have also worked on projects that required misting the walls as many as five or six times each day.

When I say “mist” I mean keeping the wall surface damp without water running down it. This can be accomplished on the “mist” setting of a garden hose spray nozzle, or by using short bursts of spray on a “gentle rain” or “shower” setting. Just enough to wet the wall. It’s important to not “fire hose” the wall—drive so much moisture into the plaster that it runs down the wall surface or worse, erodes the freshly applied plaster.  Also, applying too much liquid water can saturate the plaster and soak into whatever substrate you are working over. If that substrate is wood sheathing covered by 2-ply stucco paper (a typical conventional wall assembly)—no worries—liquid water sheds down the lapped building paper and away from the wall interior. But if the plaster is applied directly over straw bale or light-straw-clay walls (or some other cellulose based insulation) you might introduce more liquid (read “bulk”) water that can take some time to migrate back out as water vapor through the permeable plaster. Best not over-do it!

To reduce the number of times someone had to walk around a building dragging a garden hose for a week after each coat we usually draped shade tarps from roof fascia wherever direct sun would linger on the freshly plastered wall for more than a few hours. Here, north and east facing walls aren’t a problem so much as south and west facing walls.  Shade tarps also shield the wall from the drying effects of wind. As a plus, on a hot day it’s more comfortable to work in the shade! (Tip—after working under dark-colored tarps for several years I switched to using white tarps—they reflect sunlight so are much cooler to work under, and it’s easier to see what you’re doing!).

Not sure if that helps, but it’s one (retired) plasterer’s view. Err on the side of caution unless you can afford to do it over.

I look forward to hearing what your tests show!

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Sorry John, here in the U.S. "LSC" is an acronym for light-straw-clay a wonderful blend of clay and straw that goes by other names in other places.

Scott, I'll try to get to your question about damp curing Type-S lime in the next few days.

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Sounds like it worked out for you Kyle.

I like the way light plays off of the gently uneven walls we've been able to achieve with straw bales, but we work at making them that flat, mostly just keeping the bales plumb during the bale stack, and if the strings aren't exposed, shaving the walls with a Lancelot blade or chainsaw to achieve a less-bumpy wall.  

The aesthetic we aimed for has perhaps a 1/2" variation from plumb over the height of an 8' wall, which is pretty darn flat from a plasterer's perspective, but not so flat that you’d mistake it for a conventional wall.  Not "sheetrock" flat, but also more understated than when entire bales jut out of plane several inches many times across the wall.
A cautionary note for other readers of this post. Coating a straw bale or LSC wall with wet plaster or wet filler material like straw-clay needs to be done with some awareness that deep layers of wet material or deep cavities filled with wet material will dry out very slowly--sometimes so slowly that microbes become active and begin to eat until the moisture content of the material drops below 20%.    

When I was building, I tried to stuff gaps and cracks with dry straw rather than wet straw-clay or plaster unless we were able to let these stuffed or built-out areas dry for several weeks before covering the walls with plaster.  

Adding wet plaster to a dry substrate like straw bale or light-straw-clay introduces around a quart of water to each square foot of straw bale (or LSC) wall surface during a three-coat plaster process.

As a rule of thumb, lime plaster mixes need as much water as binder (by volume), and usually more. Clay plasters need somewhat less. A cubic foot of plaster covers 12 sq. ft. of wall surface at 1” thickness. A typical 1:2.5 binder : aggregate lime plaster mix is made by combining 7.5 gallons of sand with 3 gallons of lime (dry) and 3 gallons of water. (Most of the lime and water disappears into the voids between sand particles, so 7.5 + 3 + 3 = 7.5+!). Divide 3 gallons of water by 12 sq. ft., and you have .25 gallons, or a quart of water spread over each square foot of wall during the three plaster coats.  This doesn’t include moisture introduced during damp curing required for lime plasters.
Most of the water in plaster evaporates out of the plaster and away from the wall within a week of application, but some will soak into the exterior layer of straw and hold there until coaxed back out through the plaster by optimal drying conditions.

Any wet materials stuffed deeply into the wall—say a few inches or more—are going to take much longer to dry out of the wall than damp materials immediately adjacent to the plaster surface.

General advice: while you can build out very thick layers of plaster or fill material like straw-clay in order to flatten a straw bale wall (I have done it many times!), it’s much easier to keep the wall relatively flat while building it, there’s no risk of adding too much wet material to the wall, and a flatter wall is easier to plaster.  

Jim
Many Hands Builders

Hi Kyle,

You might check out the brief educational videos relating to keeping bale walls plumb at the YouTube Channel of the California Straw Building Association.

https://www.youtube.com/user/strawbalebuilding

There's one on flattening walls to make them (MUCH!) easier to plaster, and also on keeping bale walls plumb during the bale stack.  

Although the rough straw bale surface is an excellent lath for plaster, there's a limit to how thick that plaster can be.  A square foot of plaster 1" thick weighs around 15 lbs.  At 2" thick it's 30 lbs.  IRC Appendix AS Strawbale Construction, the building code available in the U.S., actually limits plaster thickness to 2" unless engineered for greater thickness.  That's because the thicker the plaster build out to accommodate a lumpy wall, the more likely the plaster will sag before it dries or cures, develop cracks due to the force of the extra weight pulling on the straw fibers, or if unsupported at the base, shear off.  Mesh over the bale surface does little to make the wall flatter, though it can reinforce the plaster.

This video series is a public service provided by CASBA; we're trying to produce around four videos each year.  CASBA is an all-volunteer non-profit organization that advocates for the use of straw as a building material.  Our members are builders, architects, engineers, and homeowners interested in using more sustainable building materials and methods.  We function as a trade association of sorts:  our members have

--written the model building codes in the U.S. for straw bale, light-straw-clay, and cob construction (among other more-natural building materials).  

--funded and/or conducted research on the fire resistance, seismic, and acoustic characteristics of different wall assemblies using straw

--produced educational materials like CASBA's Straw Bale Building Details: An Illustrated Guide for Design and Construction, videos like those on the channel link, and workshops.

--been involved in determining the life cycle analysis and carbon storage potential of straw as a building material.

There are about twelve videos so far, each treating an important step in the design and construction process.  We produce around four videos each year.  I help to select topics based on priorities.  The first subjects were chosen because the are among the mistakes seen most often in the straw bale building construction process--keeping wall flat during the bale raising, or flattening them after the bale raising--is a common concern.

Good luck!

Jim
Many Hands Builders