When I see an article like this one in the UK's Guardian, I'm reminded that it's not such a clear issue:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/08/pollutionwatch-europes-problem-diesel-cars
As someone living in a northern climate that gets quite cold in winter, I'm unsure about the reliability, range, and heating capability of electric cars in winter. And it's not just getting from point A to point B in a rural setting with many miles to drive, it's always the potential for getting stranded in a snow storm and having the reserves to stay warm in that situation. It sounds like there are solutions coming down the road, but that EVs and other alternatives are best suited for urban situations first....which makes sense as it serves the greatest number of people first and foremost.
For that reason, at our rural location in the northern US, the numbers suggest that diesel/biodiesel using an efficient engine would get better mpg than the equivalent-size gasoline model and the engines often end up lasting longer as well. But as the article indicates, in some respects "clean diesel" was oversold(?) in Europe and plenty of people seem upset with emissions even as they were pretty happy with the mpg. My question with this thread was to get more information on where the truth lies in this issue, as it certainly seems diesel's days would be numbered if it truly is dirtier and not really any more power-packing than gasoline. Yet the acceptance of diesel locally as the fuel of choice for agriculture, construction, and large 4X4 pick-up trucks is clear, and it remains a common fuel oil for home heating as well.