I think it depends on the individual/couple. Not everyone wants/can have a kid/kids. That's fine. That's why there are so many kids waiting to be adopted. What we should be doing, anyway. Instead of making more, while homeless kids wait and get kicked out once they hit 18.Tiago Simões wrote:I still feel this subject is being discussed with too little attention to the large scale patterns.
Even Paul's quote turned into a meme, while entirely true in a strict sense, only remains true in its proper context: yes, one human can change into a net positive force for the planet, but that argument breaks down at some point. 500 trillion humans, no matter how permie-esque they try to be, simply can't fit in this planet. Especially not if they still want some places to remain "zone 5".
So yes, some of us, like Josh, live in places with few other humans. Others, like me, can't reach a single trace of actual wildlife in a thousand mile radius.
But what was Paul's post about, really? Does it have a single answer, or like so many other things, "it depends"?
James MacKenzie wrote:
r ranson wrote:
James MacKenzie wrote:
again - this is an unfair and misleading equivalence. not all realistic scenarios that involve less children on earth are "dark" and not all people that chose to have less children are somehow emotionally deficient or unhappy.
eh?
That's an interesting read into what I wrote.
As a childless individual, I didn't know I was supposed to be emotionally deficient and/or unhappy. thanks? I never had kids, 1 because I never was a kid person, more a furbaby person, and 2, it just never was in the cards. I find it a lot easier, and cheaper, to be childless, and you can do things on a whim, where you can't with kids. You don't have to worry about the govt and their latest plans for them, (although I would homeschool, anyway), you can sleep in, and just do whatever it is you want to do. May seem selfish, but I'm just being honest. 🤷♀️
i allowed a nerve to be hit - it is my reaction without asking that is at fault - i owe you a big apology - i am so sorry.
Thekla McDaniels wrote:
Gotcha, Thank You. Never heard of Photovoltaic before. Yes I was confused.Anne Miller wrote:
Ashley Redding wrote: says I need to move it to a "photovoltaic" forum
I am sorry, to my best knowledge we do not have a forum called `photovoltaic` so I moved it to the Solar Forum.
Maybe the person who suggested that knows something I don't know.
I hope the information that S Bengi has given you answers your question.
If not please ask more question.
Sorry for causing confusion. I am probably the one who introduced the idea of a photovoltaic thread or forum. What I was trying to suggest was that the question might get more attention somewhere other than the passive solar thread…. Just a generic idea more closely related to solar panels.
Ashley, I’m glad you’re receiving the guidance you need.