Hello permies!
I live in NZ. I am looking to buy
land. I am passionate about horses and my
project would be to apply
permaculture design to running a farm with horses and possibly lease out some paddocks to farmers with cows and sheep. I have a degree in environmental science and worked in
sustainability. I have read a lot about
permaculture, but had limited opportunity to apply the principles.
With prices of land increasing year after year, I was thinking of selecting a property with quite a bit of land, especially to ensure that the land can sustain a few horses (around 10). There are 2 properties I am looking at and can't really decide which one would be best to convert into a "permaculture centre". My inspiration is Zaytuna farm, a place in Australia where this awesome guy converted a very poor land into very productive sustainable farm land. My idea would be to run site visits, and create a "sustainable paradise" where people can come and learn about sustainability and potentially open a cafe next to it, selling products from the farm.
The first property is 17 ha, very close to the biggest town (4km), and right on the main road leading to the village. It is used as farm land with farmers leasing paddocks for their cows. The land has been quite heavily fertilised. The biggest issue is that 40% of the land is covered in gorse (a potent weed that is very hard to remove). I was told by the real estate agent that it acts as good nursery for other plants and could be fenced off to grow into forests. It has troughts in all paddocks but
water comes from the neighbours bore (to which I would depend until I would set up another system). There is no other water source except for a small stream running down below in the bottom of the hill, which when I looked, looked quite polluted. It's also located right next to an industrial park. The town nearby though is very small (2000 pop), hence there is limited impact, although it
should probably be taken into consideration. This property is bare, just grass and gorse, pretty much with one small patch of forest. There is a really nice view on the water estuary from the top.
The other property is way larger at 56ha, but completely off the main road (11km) and 18km from the main village. Basically I would buy the whole valley for 15% more money. It's quite different, completely sheltered, and with much more biodiversity already, with good patches of forest throughout, and running streams all around the property. I could totally see how I could run a nice circuit with bridges and other fun stuff for the children. No troughs though (which would cost some money to install but I would have my own water). Good paddock fences as well. There is a school 3km nearby, which is a very good school. But it's not as easily accessible from the main road, so if I want to start getting "customers" to come, it would be a bit more difficult. Although there could potentially be good access from the kids when they finish school.
So that's where i am at. I am keen for this next step in my life to undertake a project like that. I am lucky to not have any issues as yet with money. Only thing is I am a single woman in my 30s with no family and hence I am also weighing the pros and cons based on my current situation. Do I really want to be isolated from the main town at this stage in my life (although circumstances may change - you never know!)?
Anyway, what do you guys think? Any advice you would give me? Would you go more for the 17ha or 56 ha?
Thanks heaps for your help! And please no negative comments about my project !