@Shawn H.: " ....it seems as if almost its not the fungi directly that is conferring the benefits to the plants, but rather acting as a vector for the viral organisms that confer the benefits."
It may be too early to tell and never-say-never, but the general idea at this point is that the virus either produces some product beneficial to the plant or presence of the virus in the fungus induces the fungus itself to produce something that is lacking in the virus-free strains of the fungus. Although a slightly different story, it's been known for some time that tall fescue pasture grass is most resilient to stress and drought if it is colonized by a fungus, Neotyphodium coenophialum. Unfortunately, that fungus also produces alkaloids that are toxic for certain grazing species. So lots of work has gone into making toxin-free versions of the fungus that can still colonize plants and provide stress-resilience:
http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.cfm?number=C861 . Lots of the work on tall fescue endophytes was done south of you at OSU with the huge grass-seed industry in that state.
"I wonder if these could be used as a sanctuary for beneficial viruses that might allow quick transfer to new growing locations to jumpstart the symbiotic processes."
Roosinck was likely referring to Nicotiana benthamiana, a popular lab rat for plant virus infections:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotiana_benthamiana .
The concern in planting it with the intention of supporting beneficial viruses is that it would be a pretty powerful magnet for non-beneficial viruses as well. Current research suggests that N. benthamiana owes it's unusual susceptibility to viruses to a gene variant (relative to other plant species) normally involved in virus defense (below).