Tim Blackk

+ Follow
since Feb 06, 2014
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
For More
Finley, WA
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Tim Blackk

Robert Ray wrote:This might be a starting point for your research. https://www.fs.usda.gov/recreation/programs/accessibility/pubs/htmlpubs/htm12232806/page21.htm



Thank you!  This is very helpful.  It gave me lots of ideas for how to proceed, reflected in my previous message.
7 months ago

R Scott wrote:Back to the OP, what is the climate and terrain? Availability of natural ish materials like limestone, or oyster shell, etc ?



It's an arid steppe climate in the Mid-Columbia region of southeast Washington, on an alluvial bluff whose soil is very silty, with sand, gravel, and river rock.  It's dry most of the year, 7 inches of rain per year, but moist/damp in the winter, sometimes with snow (I've seen 3 feet deep, but that's rare).  Not enough rain at any one time to erode a section of trail.  There are routes on the property which are not too steep, the soil or a pea gravel overlay can be compacted sufficiently just with foot traffic to be "firm and stable," and sufficient foot traffic can keep weeds down (I am witnessing that on paths I've been using for about a year.)  The path can be graded with a crown to prevent puddling (to keep it smooth for wheelchairs and keep people's feet out of mud).

This would be a walking path up a hill to give elementary school kids a safe path to walk to school.  Currently, they are not allowed to walk to school, partly because walking up the hill and over its crest on the shoulder of the nearby 50 mph road would be too dangerous; it would be a path of death for them; I hope to name this the "Path of Life," make a food forest along its edges, and promote permaculture to the kids and community in the process.
7 months ago
What is a natural way to make an ADA compliant footpath?  The key thing is it needs to be a hard, smooth surface for wheelchairs.
7 months ago

paul wheaton wrote:To me, this is pretty huge.



It is.  The problem is it takes a very long time to demonstrate, to prove convincingly.

Not to ask too much, but I'd be interested in a graph tracking the daily well temperature, and average outdoor air temperature, over a 2 year period.  That could answer many questions and objections, like:

Is the current temperature an anomaly caused by something other than the tubes & reflectors?
Does the well temperature drop during the winter?
Does the well temperature curve decelerate and approach a limit?
If the greenhouse temperature appears to be increasing without approaching a limit, does something need to be done to keep it within a reasonable range?

It would be very interesting to integrate this into a house.

I walked past you at the Modern Homesteading Conference, and realized you are very tall. :)

Thanks for all you're doing here.
10 months ago

John C Daley wrote:By the way what are "(non-working reefers) "? Why use such a word?
Is it a refridgerated unit?



Yes, they are refrigerated shipping containers (often called "reefers" here), but the refrigeration units no longer work.
1 year ago
I'm considering putting an earthen floor (sealed with linseed oil) in my insulated shipping containers (non-working reefers) which have aluminum T-bar flooring, and embedding hydronic radiant heating in the earthen floor.  Any advice on making this work?

There are lots of factors to consider.  Should I keep the containers' existing floor drain holes open?  Should the earthen floor be flush with the tops of the T-bars, or cover them with 1/2" or so?  Can I lay the bottom layer as dry sand/silt and wet & compact it after laying it, to make it easy to insert it between the T-bars?

The 2 containers will serve respectively as a personal library/living room/storage & workshop, so my main motivations for an installing earthen floor are:  I want to be able to sweep the floor (T-bars are hard to sweep/vacuum), heat/cool silently (any noise echoes loudly), and save money on flooring (plywood & concrete cost more).
1 year ago

Michael Cox wrote:Overall it sounds like an expensive, inefficient, and brittle system with many points of failure. There are a lot of moving parts to wear out, and in a moving vehicle this is going to be accelerated. And when failure does occur there are some rather scary failure modes (liquid air spill?)

What I'm not sure about is why you are exploring this idea? What problem does this solve for you that an off-the-shelf battery/inverter system does not?



That's probably right.

The overall goal this idea would accomplish is to provide heat, cold, electricity, and water, significantly extending the time the trailer could be boondocking/offgrid.

I plan to join the grey & black water tanks and use them only for grey water, and use a sawdust toilet.

The problems this idea would solve are:

  • dependence on plugging into the electrical & water grids
  • extra travel (once every 3 days with 2 adults & 3 kids) for getting water, dumping the tanks, getting propane; with this idea, regular shopping trips would be needed only for food & truck fuel (perhaps every 7 days when boondocking & not traveling much)
  • cooking with propane produces toxins in the living space
  • existing trailer heat, cold, electricity, and water systems typically do not capture & reuse waste heat & cold (from PV panels, inverter, battery, heater, air conditioner, refrigerator, freezer), but this system could do so
  • existing trailer heating, air conditioning, refrigerator & freezer systems may total more moving parts to break than would be involved in this idea's one unified heating & cooling system; this idea could be a gain in simplicity (but make all systems vulnerable to a single point of failure, unless the existing systems were retained and this system were added to them, which would be an incredible gain in redundancy)
  • older RV propane/ammonia absorption refrigerators are less efficient than newer compressor refrigerators, and in dual-mode refrigerators, involve converting PV electricity into storage in the battery into electricity (possibly inverted or buck-converted again) into cold
  • older RV air conditioners are less efficient than newer heat pumps/minisplits, and involve converting electricity into cold
  • LiFePO4 energy density is 110 Wh/kg; sand is 283 Wh/kg; liquid air is 121 Wh/kg
  • PV panels collect 10-30% of solar energy; thermal panels collect more than that and increase the efficiency of PV panels by cooling them; together they collect even more
  • PV panels' efficiency degrades slowly over time; thermal panels' efficiency may degrade at a slower rate
  • the next bullet points all center around this:  lithium is an expensive storage medium; sand & air are cheap; investing in the storage medium may be less economical than investing in the balance of system components
  • LiFePO4 batteries have a cycle life of around 5000 cycles then need to be replaced; sand in the sand batteries and air in the liquid air tank don't lose capacity over time; sand & liquid air batteries can be repaired with mostly inexpensive off-the-shelf components, except for the turbines/compressors/heat pumps
  • similarly, expanding the capacity of a LiFePO4 battery seems more expensive (buy cells) than expanding the capacity of a sand or liquid air battery (buy tanks)
  • LiFePO4 batteries are relatively heavy when 100% discharged, but liquid air batteries are relatively light weight when 100% discharged
  • lithium is more expensive, less renewable, more toxic, and more flammable than are sand and air
  • 2 years ago
    These are great questions to make me consider whether this idea is practical.  I really appreciate your help in that regard.

    S Bengi wrote:How much heat and electricity do you need per day for your trailer?



    If I only generate electricity, in kWh/day I need a minimum of 1.8, maximum of 13.  Most days we would use around 5, exactly like your estimate.

    S Bengi wrote:Do you have enough roof to collect all of this heat and electric?



    No but I plan to build wings so the panels will lie flat against the sides of the trailer while driving, then raise up above the trailer while parked.  This will be large enough to hold the 21 240W (totaling 5kW instantaneous) panels I bought from SanTan Solar for $735.  I have an MPP Solar Hybrid LVX 6048 I bought from Watts247 for $1,577, and if I were to build the 15-16 kWh battery bank with LiFePO4 batteries I've been planning, the cells would cost around $2,483.  The total for these items (not counting wires, racking, 48-12V DC buck converter, etc.) is $4,795.

    Battery cells:  https://www.mobile-solarpower.com/raw-lifepo4-deals-page.html
    Battery designs:  https://www.mobile-solarpower.com/design-your-own-12v-lifepo4-system.html

    S Bengi wrote:Current Tech for a 33ft long trailer:
    5kW or 15kWhr/day Solar PV Array @ $5,500.
    10kW or 30kWHr/day Solar Thermal @ $5,500. It sits under the regular solar panel, about 30F above ambient temperature



    Thank you very much for telling me about sundrumsolar.com!  I've been looking for a suitable plate heat exchanger, and theirs looks to be exactly what I want.  I like their general idea of using a heat pump to collect heat even on cooler days.

    S Bengi wrote:1kW or 6kWHr/day Heat Pump COP=5 @ $1,000
    7.5kW Hydrid Inverter/Charger @ $5,500.
    7.5kW or 15kWHr LiFePO4 battery @ $5,500.

    Proposed Tech for a 33ft long trailer
    Given that it cost about $11,000 for a 7.5kW, 15kWHr/day battery+inverter/charger setup.



    I think this estimate assumes I would be buying new panels, off-the-shelf batteries, and perhaps pay a professional for the design & install.  Since I'm building the PV array & battery, I expect to have a lower cost than this estimate.

    S Bengi wrote:And it takes up about 6ft3.
    How much would your sand battery+rankine turbine system cost and how much space would it take up?



    I don't know yet.  My thought is to fit it onto the tongue of the trailer, where the propane bottles are now, and wrap it with a fairing.

    S Bengi wrote:To get 15kWHr out we would have to store 45kWHr due to losses



    If this is the case my idea is not practical, because LiFePO4 batteries have a 90-95% round trip efficiency.

    S Bengi wrote:And to store 45kWHr we would have to put in 50kWHr
    Because we need to maintain a temperature delta, lets keep the state of discharge at 50% so really we need 100kWhr of storage



    High grade heat (650C+) in the sand battery, and high grade cold (-196C) in the liquid air battery would not need to be kept below 50% state of discharge because I think the cryophorous cold steam Rankine cycle can run from 100C all the way down to close to 0C.

    S Bengi wrote:How much space will the 100kWHr thermal sand battery take up at 485F?



    Glass melts at 1400-1600C, so I'm estimating a sand battery could be as hot as 1200C in a glass container, and be cooled as low as 0C by the cryophorous system.  With that temperature range, 16kWh of heat could be stored in 57 kg of sand, which is about 85 liters, or 22 gallons, and 100 kWh could be stored in 353 kg, which is 530 liters or 140 gallons.  But if the sand battery's max temperature was 485F, the amounts would be 1,688 kg, and 2,532 liters or 669 gallons, which is impractical for a trailer.

    S Bengi wrote:How will you get the energy in the sand battery (wires or tubes)? What will you use for the energy source: regular solar electric or will it be solar thermal?



    I'm not sure yet.  Maybe a heat pump which can transform low grade heat into high grade heat (1200C), and use steam as the working fluid, so that means tubes.  Electrical resistance heating elements can get that hot easily; I don't know whether there are heat pumps which can do so.

    So I'm thinking the main heat source for the sand battery would be solar thermal run through a heat pump, with solar electric as a secondary source.

    S Bengi wrote:Or will it be a fancy heat pump with a temperature delta of over 400F what will the COP be 1?



    The COP of a stirling engine is about 0.4 (40% efficiency), but it can have a very high temperature delta (-196C to 700C+; a delta of 1,613 degrees F), which you can see at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFfMruoRMGo.

    S Bengi wrote:Can you send a link to a 7.5kW rankine turbine that operates at 485F to 235F, I would love to see the price and specs and size



    I don't have that information.  Charlie Solis might be able to answer it; see the following:

  • 4+ kW turbine, which could be run at combustion temperatures - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nndCJixLhiE
  • 10 inch turbine stats - https://www.testurenergy.com/10-inch-turbine-system
  • $20,000 for complete 10kW solar thermal collector, 50kWh storage, 10 kWh electrical / 20 kWh thermal generation system - https://www.testurenergy.com/solar-cryophorus-turbine-system
  • 2 years ago

    Douglas Alpenstock wrote:Cool stuff! But a lot of moving parts.



    Yes, and the many parts could break due to the trailer's vibration on the road. If these ideas were used for a house, vibration would be less of an issue.  The turbine's noise could be a problem too, although noise is a function of mechanical balance and efficiency.  I think though that the moving parts would literally be valves, switches, sensors, pumps, and turbine bearings, all of which could be selected to handle vibration and generally be available as off the shelf components which would be relatively easy to replace.

    It would definitely be simpler and more solid state to just use a lithium iron phosphate battery.
    2 years ago