L Anderson

pollinator
+ Follow
since Apr 04, 2020
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
Biography
Retired Sociologist.  2 acres, 2 horses, 2 alpaca, and 3 little dogs. Multiple Sclerosis (I know, I shouldn’t boast. Just my little contribution to building awareness of a very weird disease. Job done.)
For More
Willamette Valley, OR
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
1
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by L Anderson

Here is a quick description of a successful experiment using madrone:

https://jenjoycedesign.com/2020/07/25/a-natural-dye-experiment-part-2/

Thinks to note:
The dye materials must be heated to extract color. A week-long soak in the sun is one way to get things started, but jus5busung the stove is fine. Don’t boil! A gentle simmer. Typically for at least an hour, though I unusually go longer.
Once it’sremoved from heat, let it sit for awhile, at least overnight. You will get stronger color the longer it soaks.

Soak your clean wool thoroughly (minimum 1/2 hour) before adding it to the cooled dye pot (after the dye material has been strained out). Don’t add room temperature wool to a hot dye pot - you risk felting/fulling* the wool.

Wool deteriorates in high ph. Most wool dyeing involves adding vinegar (the kind in kitchen cupboards) or citric acid crystals
Kool-aid makes a great fuss free dye for wool because it already contains citric acid.

Wool will also deteriorate if your dye pot is too hot. Heat is good, up to a limit. Heat the pot slowly, and try not to let it get above a slow simmer.  If it boils you will still get dyed wool, but it will most likely lose softness, become a little crunchy, and wear out faster.

Simmer for an hour or so, then let it cool before removing the fiber. In fact, for many natural dyes, the longer you leave the fiber in the dye water, the more dye that gets taken up.

There is great variation in color- and light-fastness when dyeing with natural dyes, depending on the plants used.  It helps to wash natural dyed items gently in cool water, and hang to dry away from sunlight.

1 day ago
When measuring and mixing powders (alum, ground dyestuffs, etc) wear a mask. You don’t want that stuff in your lungs.
2 months ago
I echo the benefit of including a little more information about the rocket part.  If I didn’t know anything about it, seeing the picture and reading that it is (may be) fueled by wood, I would probably imagine fireplace wood or woodburning stove wood. Pretty big pieces that have to be tended, and added to.  So something more about the characteristics of “the wood” and how easy it is to get it (you don’t need a woodshed) and how little tending is necessary —- all the stuff that makes the system economical and efficient in terms of time, effort, $$, and environmental protection.
3 months ago
1. You crack me up with your cat herding attempts ( no sarcasm there - it really did tickle me).

2. You already had me years ago with the sunchokes and the onions. But I’m still not eating kale.

3. I finished Restoration Agriculture last week. You’re right - Shepard already did all the work.

4. I wonder how many of your restricted target audience are already growing those things? If the answer is “most,” perhaps that’s why some of us persist in spinning off into other scenarios?

I love your posts. They always get me thinking differently about my own backyard. (Plus you can be very funny.)
Inge:
Thank you for this list of easy vegetables! It will help me to expand what I grow.
By the way, I wonder if your sweet beet is related to parsnip? I
Paul - I really like your food pump idea.  I am especially enthusiastic that you are focusing on a wide range of groups (people needs, stages, etc). This should result in a number of models that people can use and tweak and make them their own.

At the moment, I have a basic question (preoccupation?): how is “staple crop” defined and operationalized? The bullet points listed under your initial list (sunchokes, walking onions, and the other one that just slipped my mind) is helpful in  providing some different  ways to think about it.  Of course there will be variations in the actual plants that different people advocate for (or against)  based on their individual circumstances - growing experiences, tastes, resources, geography,
……

So I am assuming that you offer the 3 that you derived from your poll as an heuristic device. I am proceeding as though that is the case, and please pardon me if I am wrong about that.

Anyway, I am finding your project timely, and expect to be following it closely.   I have had to downsize drastically the space I have for growing food, and the space itself is fraught with challenges that I won’t bother to list here.  
I moved here last May, so had little time for planning and planting (and figuring out how to work around those challenges).  Having been a regular reader on the website for  a number of years, at least I was equipped with a lot of potential strategies in my back pocket and managed to get a little good out of my yard and generate some ideas going forward.

I’m just begun my second year here. I implemented some of those ideas, tried out new ones, got more food out of my yard than last year, and learned a lot more about how this plot of land works.

But coming back to the food pump idea, and defining one’s staple crops.
Gradually over the summer, I had to jettison so many taken for granted expectations regarding  what I grow, how much of it I grow, and how I grow it.  Years and years of gardening and eating.

It has been a difficult road, accepting that I couldn’t provide for myself as before, and have confidence that nearly everything I ate was produced in ways that nurtured the land and at the same time maximized the nutrients in my food.

Then, just a couple of weeks ago I realized I’d been in mourning and it was time to rethink my whole food producing system. That was daunting. But a few days after that, it occurred to me I couldn’t provide start by identifying which dietary niche I could best meet with the resources I have.

Hence, my question: how to define staple crops?

My conclusion for my situation:
1. Calories no longer matter in my calculus for what grow. If we get to a place where I can’t afford enough beans and rice, I’m doomed anyway.  
2. I’m getting older.  I like perennials. So much less work. Much kinder to the soil. And many of them provide much needed hedges and shade. I can nibble on fruits all summer and still have plenty to preserve for the winter, even after the  birds take their share. And, I can repurpose my stupid front lawn to food production without irritating my way too close to me neighbors  by planting the pretty ones out front. Persimmon. Elderberry. Plum. Interspersed with natives that might tempt the urban wildlife enough that they leave enough fruit for me.  (And eventually fill up the whole front yard until there is no more room for lawn, save a few paths).
3. Backyard: continue focus on high nutrition foods. Yes, I started some jerusalem artichoke.  Tree collards. Blueberries and raspberries.  But as much variety as I can get in the vegetable department.  Lots of raised planters (at least 2 feet high - I’m old, and my soil is heavily compacted clay fill. I can make it better but it will take time).

Bottom line:  my staple crops will be:
1. those which provide the greatest variety of vitamins and minerals and antioxidants and all that other good stuff that others take pills for but I’d rather get from my food. So: maximize variety for good nutrition.
2. Those that I can find space for, or create space for, that I can manage (physically) while aging in place.
3. Those that are good for the ground and the air and help support birds and bees etc. And don’t require crazy amounts of water (it no longer rains here in summer), and can tolerate ever increasing heat.

Long winded, as usual. I blame Paul.  Having to think very differently in a very short time, and not of my choosing, has been a slog. Then Paul shows up with a framework that can help me to focus my goals (as in, what amI doing this for? What do I expect to get given what I have? What is important to me? Is it attainable given what I have available?).

So here is my stream of consciousness shaggy dog story offered as an illustration of one way to apply a food pump model.
Again, I apologize if I’ve got the concept all wrong. But I think it’s not there to tell us what to grow. Even Paul can’t make me eat kale. Ever.
Rather, I see it as a very helpful model to help us along the path of defining our needs and wants and figuring out the best way to meet them.

I learn best from examples. Not one or two, but many.
And given that this model aspires to focus on all different kinds of growers and growing situations, I’m thinking there might be lots of thoughtful examples to inspire me for a long time.  
And I’m not going to pay attention to stuff I don’t like in it (like kale, or making my own biochar).  
I’m going to pay attention to the parts that get me thinking of possibilities I hadn’t thought of.

Thank you, Paul.
PS, regarding the titles, I like the last photo.

And yes - I will definitely be backing the kickstarter.
5 months ago
Ohhh - reading the list of recipes — I’m already in love.

Regarding the photos: I like all the breads - any one of them would be great.
I also like the photo of the buns. They are beautiful and just begging to be eaten.
As are the pancakes. I really really like that one. To me, it shows something really different. Something you eat with a knife and fork, not your hands. Something you can build a delicious meal around without too much trouble. Something you can’t just pick up at the bakery, or even a restaurant. Something that isn’t often found in sourdough books.

In summary, my vote: 3 items (everything comes in 3s, right?):
Bread of your choice, sandwich buns, and pancakes.
5 months ago