Mark Reed wrote:Here, in the 1960s and I guess before, everybody had lots of chickens. They were not penned up at all. They were not fed much at all except in winter when they got some cracked corn in the morning and maybe a little more as they came back to the coop at night. Coyotes, foxes and bobcats were almost totally absent back then because they were shot or trapped to near regional extinction. If one was spotted, every boy much over 8 years old was handed a rifle and put on patrol. Owls and hawks were very rare for the same reason and more so because of DDT. The coop was closed up at night against minks and weasels, which I guess were harder to eliminate.
I do mean lots of chickens. Baked chicken, fried chicken, stewed chicken was on the table at least once a week, all year along with the occasional turkey or goose. When mom said, you kids go get me a chicken for supper she did not mean, go the store. Eggs were on the menu one way or another almost every day. I don't remember what happened to excess eggs, maybe some were sold or given away or traded.
I don't remember much worry over breeds, but I do remember some breed names. Leghorns, Rhode Island Reds and bantams just lived together. They were just identified by body type. A big fat chicken to bake, a skinny one or an extra rooster to fry, an old fat one to stew. Roosters were commonly traded between families or farms. Broody hens were identified each spring and locked in their own little coops with a bunch of eggs, she and her brood were fed until they were big enough to be turned loose with the others, but I don't remember what. I think the type of chicken that dominated a flock was controlled by what roosters were chosen to keep living but there was always a big variety.
I think what I remember was about the last of it. DDT was banned and by the 1970s many farms were abandoned and especially in more hilly areas land was left to begin reforestation. I guess people didn't need their chickens anymore or their vegetable gardens, it was easier and more stylish to work in a factory. All the predators began to rebound. Now, if you tried to keep chickens that way, you would soon have no chickens.
Jay Angler wrote:
Sam Shade wrote:That's a totally free, endlessly renewable feed source for at the very least a steady supply of meat (haven't tested the all-forage diet on dairy production yet).
A neighbor lost a goat who had been feeding 2 kids. It may have been a lack of selenium, as our soils are naturally low in it, or it could have been other minerals. So knowing your soil as well as the nutritional value of a variety of forages put together, is important for milk production. I'm sure I read of someone offering a variety of different minerals separately, rather than the "multivitamin" approach which has been shown not to work that well on humans at least. The animals were smart enough to know which minerals they needed and did very well with that approach.
And wrote:Elaeagnus ebbingei (another evergreen for goats and rabbits plus edible berries)
Chocolate vine (semi-evergreen vine that produces bizzaro but edible akebia fruit)
These can both be invasive in areas. That can be an asset if you've got enough animals to keep them under control, but worth looking into how controllable they are in your specific climate. There are a couple of Elaeagnus species that are not invasive in my ecosystem, but are elsewhere.
Matthew Nistico wrote:
Sam Shade wrote:I have three goumis I started from cuttings two years ago. Absolute tanks. My dad ripped one of them out of the ground on accident and we put it back in with no ill effects.
No fruit yet though.
Well, get ready because, when they do start fruiting, they fruit A LOT!
I have both seedling and named cultivar goumis. I have to say that the named cultivars are worth it in terms of superior fruit quality. Since I have so many, I think this coming season I will observe and mark all of the seedling goumi bushes in my food forest for deletion. I can use that space for something else and, so long as you have at least three or four thriving, producing goumi bushes, you have all the berries you could likely need. I'm sure I have more like 10 or a 12 cultivar bushes that would remain.
Matthew Nistico wrote:I nominate Goumi berry (Elaeagnus multiflora). It gets a bad rap from the uneducated simply through association with other elaeagnus species that are considered invasive. But not so with Goumi - I have many bushes over many years and have seen precious few seedlings. It doesn't root sucker, either.
In my climate and region - clay soils, temperate, USDA zone 8, but right near to the border of zone 7, high annual rainfall but frequent summer droughts - Goumi has proven highly productive, highly ornamental, and pretty much bullet proof. Even where I have stuck it in too much shade, it still grows and fruits, just not vigorously. It seems to thrive on neglect and shrugs off periods of too much/too little rain.
I really don't know why more people aren't growing this species, both inside and outside of the Permieverse! The only downside I will admit is that the occasional thorn makes dealing with the bush slightly unpleasant. But still a lot better than brambles or wild raspberry or other truly prickly plants.