Huh, the more I look at this, the more mysterious it seems. If you google on "black locust toxic" you get a lot of hits with warnings of toxicity, but if you google "black locust fodder" you get a whole lot of hits with personal reports from people who have fed it to their rabbits, their chickens, goats, etc for years with no problems. And university papers like this:
"The leaves are used for livestock feed in the Republic of Korea and in Bulgaria (Keresztesi 1983, 1988). In the highlands of Nepal and northern India, where black locust is naturalized, it is an important fodder tree. Branches above the reach of livestock are cut when other green for-ages are scarce, and the wood is used later for fuel.
Ground black locust tops including woody stems, from first and second harvests, were found to be comparable to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) with 23-24% crude protein, 7% lignin, and 4.2 kcal/g. Ruminal digestion by cattle was also equivalent (Baertsche et al. 1986). When planted at close spacings, the new growth can be harvested with conventional farm machinery for silage or hay (Fig. 2, 3). The compound leaves can be separated and ground for a high-protein ingredient of commercial feeds. Because black locust thrives on sites too marginal for alfalfa, it merits further study as a forage crop."
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1990/v1-278.html And actually, most of the warnings seem to have to do with horses. So I don't know -- and I'm still wondering if somebody didn't mix up another plant with black locust.