Konstantinos Karoubas

pollinator
+ Follow
since Mar 20, 2012
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
For More
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Konstantinos Karoubas

Good question, May.

Yes, our winters are generally mild and provide enough moisture to support grasses, shrubs, and other vegetation in many areas.

Unfortunately, many of our mountains are now largely bare. In many places, the topsoil has been washed away, leaving only a very thin layer of soil over rock. This creates a significant challenge for anyone trying to restore forests.

A good example is the island of Crete. Historically, it was heavily forested. Today, large numbers of goats graze across the landscape, preventing natural regeneration and contributing to land degradation. In many areas, groundwater resources are also under severe pressure.

Sadly, Greece is not alone in facing these problems. Similar challenges can be found throughout many parts of the world.

Ultimately, we as a global community need to rethink our priorities and our relationship with the land before it is too late.

Kostas
6 days ago

Greetings,





This site is different from the areas where I usually plant acorns beneath pine trees.

We're standing on a mountain that, from roughly 1920 until about 1980, was heavily used by the surrounding communities. Four villages depended on this mountain for their livelihoods. Families kept large herds of goats, which grazed continuously across the landscape. People also harvested wood to make charcoal, to cook their food, and to heat their homes in winter.

The mountain was an essential resource that helped generations of families survive. They did what they needed to do, and no one told them the land was being overgrazed and overharvested. As a result, the vegetation gradually disappeared.

An elderly man, now nearly eighty, told me that when he was a child and a young man, this mountain looked almost barren. Looking across it, you could hardly see anything green. The goats consumed nearly every plant that emerged, leaving behind little more than exposed stone and rock.

Over the last twenty-five years, though, things have started to change. Most people have stopped raising goats, and the remaining oak shrubs are no longer cut for firewood. Modern fuels and changing lifestyles have removed the need to harvest every available tree, and nature has slowly begun to recover.

Below this mountain lies a fertile valley. Unfortunately, the last forty to fifty years haven't been kind to the local ecosystem. Around 1980, people tell me groundwater could be reached at depths of only twenty meters — plenty of water beneath the soil. But no limits were placed on pumping, and no one restricted the number of wells being drilled. Farmers extracted water faster than nature could replace it.
Today, in 2026, we face a very different reality. Groundwater levels have dropped dramatically. In many places, wells now have to be drilled more than 250 meters deep to find water. Some communities are already worried about their drinking water supply. If current trends continue, there may come a time when there isn't enough water to irrigate crops — or even enough to meet basic human needs.
It's a troubling picture, but it isn't hopeless.

If this mountain were covered once again with a healthy forest of large trees, it could provide enormous benefits. Trees cool the land, protect the soil, and help rainwater soak deep into the ground, replenishing underground aquifers. Forests store water like natural reservoirs. They also release moisture into the atmosphere, helping to create clouds and encourage rainfall.
Trees aren't merely part of the landscape — they're part of the water cycle itself. Without trees, rainfall declines. Without water, there is no life.

There are also things we can do right now. One of the most important is changing how we farm. Agricultural fields should stay covered with living plants year-round. Green manure crops, cover crops, and permanent ground cover protect the soil, reduce evaporation, increase organic matter, and help water infiltrate the ground. We need to move away from leaving bare soil exposed and from excessive tillage. Keeping the land green year-round takes a new agricultural mindset, but it can bring immediate benefits — for the environment, for local temperatures, and for water conservation.

I hope we can still make meaningful changes. The next generation deserves better than what we're leaving behind. We've used up much of the groundwater that belonged not only to us but to those who come after us. We've removed many of the trees that purified the air, protected the soil, and supported the water cycle.

The good news is that nature can recover, if we give it the chance. The sooner we restore our forests, protect our water resources, and regenerate our soils, the better the odds that future generations inherit a healthier, more resilient landscape.

The conditions here are very difficult. In places we have only a thin slice of soil, and in others none at all — spots where it's hard to even find enough soil to bury an acorn, with solid rock just beneath. It's critical to plant the acorns near spots where their roots can find a path down to the moisture trapped between the rocks. Oak shrubs clearly find these pathways to reach deep underground and survive.
One approach is to plant acorns near the mountaintops and hope that, over 100, 200, or 300 years, they spread and cover the whole mountain — the acorns falling and germinating downhill by gravity over generations. It's difficult because the subsoil here is so poor. When we plant beneath pine trees, the young oaks are protected in two ways: by the shape of the pine canopy, and by the pine's own root system, which they can follow to find moisture and nutrients. Here, we don't have that advantage.

One idea worth considering is controlled burns — clearing a section of the mountain at a time and, where the oak shrubs are, planting acorns along with other tree seeds like almond and apricot. Different oak species will likely respond differently to these conditions. It will take time to evaluate the right approach, and it will take more people getting involved — forestry departments and universities should be studying this site, and the government needs to allocate funding to address a real problem we're facing here. In the meantime, we'll keep trying.

Kostas





6 days ago
Greetings to all,
all the best !!!

Another update (I hope its useful to some (few) people (one or two).



In this video, we're visiting one of the sites where we're planting acorns, south of Thessaloniki.

Here, we're planting acorns among the pine trees. We're doing this at different locations around Thessaloniki and Greece to test how soil conditions and microclimate affect the planting.

This is the fourth or fifth year we've been planting at this particular site. The previous years were failures for various reasons — some years the acorns didn't sprout, other years they sprouted but the young oak trees died. This year, out of necessity, we're planting evergreen oak acorns (the evergreen "Palestinian oak") acorns, simply because the common/white oak trees haven't produced any acorns. So we'll see how these do.

Most of the acorns have sprouted, and the trees look very strong. To reiterate the logic behind this approach: it's economical. If we were to buy nursery-grown oak saplings, dig holes, transplant them, and then spend the summer watering them, that's a huge investment of energy, time and money. But simply planting acorns is a small investment of time, so we can afford to come back and try again three, four, even five times until we succeed — assuming, of course, that we eventually get established trees. We can't keep doing this indefinitely.

It's important to think through what will actually happen if these trees die, whether from fire or disease. There's a possibility the pines could regrow on their own through natural revegetation — but with rainfall no longer what it used to be, that becomes much harder. And even if the pines did grow back, that's not really a desirable outcome anyway, since their long-term survival isn't likely. So there's little point waiting around for natural revegetation to save the day.
A more realistic possibility is that the land ends up bare, or covered in oak shrubs, or stripped down to bare stone once the topsoil washes away.

It's important to recognize the consequences of land that used to be covered in pine forest becoming bare. Losing that green cover raises the local temperature, reduces how much water gets stored underground, and cuts down on the moisture released into the air by the trees. In other words, the importance of trees really can't be overstated — they replenish underground water supplies, and they help generate rainfall. Trees are, in a real sense, responsible for the clouds that bring the rain.

Rather than risk leaving future generations with that kind of outcome, I think it makes more sense to plant oak trees now. The problem is that planting oaks the conventional way is difficult — it means watering all summer long, which is manageable near roads but becomes very hard once you're 100 or 200 meters, or a kilometer, away from them. That's why we're focused on growing oaks from acorns instead.
So that's where we stand at this site. It's an interesting case because at another location, the acorns from these same years have grown into oak trees, but here they haven't. We'll keep an eye on them and go from there.

Kostas




6 days ago
Thanks for the info May,

Your knowledge of the different soil types is beyond me.

If you can try different types of acorns for different types of soils and report back to us, it would be greatly welcomed and appreciated.

Kostad
1 month ago
Greetings to all !!!
All the best to all - peace on earth,



Title: Acorn Planting Experiment & Field Observations Near Thessaloniki

Today we visited an area near Thessaloniki where we’ve planted acorns over the past few years, including a site from December 8th of this year.

There, we tested a new planting method:

· Dig a hole 15–20 cm deep.
· Place two spoonfuls or handfuls of damp vermiculite on one side of the hole.
· Add a few centimeters of good topsoil in the middle.
· Lay two acorns down.
· Fill the hole with the remaining topsoil.
· Sprinkle small seeds (vetch, arugula, alfalfa) on top.

Results: The acorns did very well, despite some losses to field mice or other creatures—which we accept as natural. We found many young evergreen oaks growing, specifically the Palestine oak (Quercus calliprinos). We’ll continue monitoring them.

This year, we had difficulty finding common deciduous oak acorns in the area, so most planted were Palestine oaks and holm oaks.

Future recommendation: Use this method again. Optionally, mix 20–30% damp vermiculite into the topsoil just below the acorns. Using damp vermiculite is especially important if the soil might dry out before expected rains. However, we’re cautious about using too much vermiculite, as it might cause seed rot—time will tell.

We also visited other nearby areas where we simply dug holes and put small seeds on top. We observed young oaks in various conditions and performed the "bend test" on a young oak that hadn’t yet developed green leaves. To perform the bend test: bend the trunk 180°. If it snaps, it’s likely dead; if it bends without breaking, it’s alive.

We have several acorn-planting sites around Thessaloniki and will share more updates as interesting developments arise.

Kostas
1 month ago
Hey Martin,
Great idea
Give it a try and let us know the results.

As far as your age…
It’s only a number

Keep fighting till the end!!!

Kostas
1 month ago
This is a great book on Oak trees

Very informative

Kostas
1 month ago
Thanks for the info! I appreciate the details on controlled burns.


It makes me wonder if the author is exaggerating a bit. Is an 80% to 90% loss of Ponderosa pines in the next two decades really realistic, or is it closer to 5% or 10%? Where do we actually stand right now in terms of total population loss? And I mean loss that it total-no natural tree reforestation.


Either way, if severe fires mean the Ponderosa pines can't grow back, it seems like a great opportunity to build a new ecosystem from scratch.


Oaks are incredibly tough and thrive everywhere from southern Canada to northern Mexico and northern Africa to southern Russia, so they would be perfect as the main replacement tree.


Post-fire ash leaves behind really rich soil. Instead of giving up and letting the land turn to desert, we could seed fast-growing plants like arugula, barley, or Mediterranean heartwort right away to stop soil erosion and plant a large variety of trees by planting seeds. I've already seen oaks and almonds and other prunus family trees thrive after a fire. So a fire is an opportunity to create a better ecosystem.


If these pessimistic projections are realistic, the human and economic costs will be devastating. Action is needed now. The threat is severe enough to justify shifting 10% or more of the defense budget toward ecological restoration. Repurposing military technology from weapons to reforestation is a practical application of this shift. True national security involves protecting the environment before the crisis becomes irreversible. The people most affected need to act.


To make these kind of decisions you need good data.


I don't know, I'm just thinking.


Kostas
1 month ago
Greetings to all, and best wishes,

I would like to share an article in NYTIMES by Gary Furguson.

NYTIMES - Ponderosa Pines

The article says:

after about 26 years of exceptionally high heat and drought, hundreds of millions of these trees in lands stretching from New Mexico and Colorado to the southern Sierra Nevada of California have died. And in many places, something even more startling is happening: The trees aren’t coming back.

It continues,

In 50 or so years, by some estimates, snow could virtually disappear from the West, making life there exceedingly difficult.

And,

The government should treat this situation as deeply threatening to the habitability of the West. .

The article discusses how prescribed burns are being employed to save the trees, and that millions of seedlings of ponderosa pines are being produced for the purpose of replanting.

Being far away from this area, the first question I have,
Is this the reality there ? Members of this forum can shed some light.

The 2nd question, and I don't know who can answer it.

If ponderosa pines cannot handle the new weather conditions, why do they want to plant more of them.
Why not plant broadleaf trees like oaks instead.


Why not employ drone technology and human labor to plant millions of acorns.

This matter is urgent - it effects millions of people - and it will major economic impact

Kostas


1 month ago