gift
Clean With Cleaners You Can Eat by Raven Ranson
will be released to subscribers in: soon!

Edward Lye

+ Follow
since Jun 06, 2019
Merit badge: bb list bbv list
For More
Apples and Likes
Apples
Total received
In last 30 days
2
Forums and Threads

Recent posts by Edward Lye

M Ljin wrote:With all this talk of flying cars, why not bring up hot air balloons too?



PSA hot air balloons are counter-intuitive as was the case with
        Chrysler's turbine engine.

I wouldn't suggest this unless I can understand this video.



5 hours ago
This gyro doesn't need a runway. First time I have come across this BUT
you need a quarter of a million dollars.

gyrocopter
11 hours ago

Les Frijo wrote:I wonder if an aircar might work for you....



Gyrocopters/gyroplanes. I would go for this James Bondian contraption.

If the wind is just right, you are stationary in the air just like the
Antonov AN-2 and might even "fly" backwards.

12 hours ago

jason holdstock wrote:

I bought a land cruiser for work in about 2007.  

If I bought a new car in Europe today it is loaded with electric stuff I do not want or need, lights and beeps to distract, all adding complexity, weight and cost. A warning light will be a fail at the annual inspection, Dealer required, simple cheap fixes are not in their vocabulary.

Why aren't there small efficient light simple cheap vehicles being made?



My answers in order.

Most bad guys/terrorists in movies seem to predominantly drive Toyota Land Cruisers.
They know something.

Modern car makers are not your friends:



Tightened Government regulations over emissions and safety muscle out small cars:






1 day ago
Just some random thoughts -  bear in mind that development
can take extraordinary leaps if the drive to succeed exists. I cite
the 7 decades gap between Kitty Hawk and a moon landing.

If you are after really really zero emissions, any EV will be overshadowed
by a compressed air vehicle. Mining trains have run on compressed
air produced by the Ragged Chutes compressed air plant.  The closest
we can ever get to a zero carbon footprint.

I reckon the rain runoff from the roof of  a 38-storey(about 107metres))
building is equivalent to Ragged Chutes. By comparison, the Great Pyramid
of Giza stands 138m tall.

If that range is insufficient, there is always the turbine engine.
It burns so hot that there are no noxious fumes at the exhaust.
Just like the RMH, this engine burns clean.
By way of context, the M1 Abrams tank does not use an EV motor
nor a petrol engine nor a diesel engine but a gas turbine engine.
Ask yourself why this particular choice.

Both technologies for passenger cars and pickups have not
progressed. Just think of what we could be driving around
in now. Instead of hot exhausts, cars entering a city  bring
cool fresh air instead.

For a pickup, the turbine engine will charge the battery that
drives an electric motor. I think that is the best combination.
Everything can be modular so repairs are reduced to detaching
and reattaching cables, hoses and piping to a reconditioned
module.  The Honda Prius once used NiMh batteries. That was
and is viable. I simply don't trust Lithium ion batteries.

The Chrysler turbine engine could run on anything combustible
like diesel, alcohol and even perfume. So, Ben Peterson's
wastebot can produce fuel from trash plastic lying by the roadside.

A win-win deal for everyone.

During WW2, civilian vehicles ran on wood gas because the
precious petrol and diesel was needed for war machines.
If you attempt this, the EPA might come after you.





Ragged Chutes


1 day ago
Short answer - - - I haven't a clue.

PSA answer - just be aware of fire hazards around using linseed oil.

1 week ago

paul wheaton wrote:



I don't have any of those tools.

In my experience, I always use control ropes because
I always find that a sudden breeze in the wrong direction
can quickly ruin your day.
2 weeks ago
These are practical examples that avoid the use
of the Euler–Eytelwein formula. They are purely
trial-and error methods with good success . . .
so far.

The first example is supposed to demonstrate the
descent of a substantial branch that overhung
the property fence. Unfortunately a stray tiny
branch snagged the rope and due to other pressing
matters and prolonged neglect, the rope
deteriorated/snapped before I resumed filming.

The first video shows how I dismantle a tree/branch
in small stages and how I avoid whiplash or
unanticipated sudden motions that could knock
me off the extension laddder or break something.

I described this method at another post:
https://permies.com/t/24998/woodland/timbertool-tree-jack
I think it is the last post. A diagram and more detailed
description can be found there.



The ladder is secured to the tree via both rope and
chain - I take lots of precautions and it is loose
enough to prevent any storm sway from damaging the
ladder.



With two or three wraps around the capstan (in
this case the top bar of a swing), and a small
weight, the load is unable to move due to the
friction imposed. Adding a second weight in the
middle allows you - with appropriate
manipulations - to advance or reverse while
maintaining a secure hold on the load. the
intention is to lower the branch in increments
as I cut away at the bits reaching the ground.



ascent part2

In the second demonstration, I transport an old
table to the balcony. The table weighs 12.5 kg
and is extremely difficult to manouever through
the house and up the stairs all by myself.

I used two static capstans in this case. The pulleys
are two tyre-less wheelbarrow wheels. The Moringa
outgrew its pot and toppled against the balcony.

I have tied it to the balcony and my remaining cat
Leeseunggi easily scales it to reach the balcony.
She descends via the Neem tree where the extension
ladder is currently positioned.

The photo shows the intended location of the
table.

Why?

It is just a stop gap measure. For some
unknown reason, during the 3 to 5 inch storms,
the gutter overflows there and the waterfall
is enough to overpower the lip of the roof tiles
thus flooding the ceiling underneath.  

The rope I used was deteriorated at the bleached
spots and splintered but held together long enough
for the mission. I have retired that.

Do not attempt these unless you can accept the risks.

EDIT:

In hindsight, I should have used captive pulleys because
if the rope escapes one pulley, the load will swing and
almost certainly cause the other to escape and the load
will come crashing down.

The same thing will happen if one rope breaks.

Two ropes gives false security. I failed to include
a safety/failsafe rope.

In reality, the drawing shows the rope at the pulley
drawn incorrectly. There is a limit to simulating scenarios
in the mind. In reality, it is better reversed as the rope
will not have to rub against any surface. You adjust
according to what you find on the ground.

In contrast the captive branch technique has
withstood a dozen trials.

"Every plan fails at the first contact with the enemy."

2 weeks ago
. . . continuing from the post above, the money shot is here:

2 weeks ago

Mike Turner wrote:I needed to prune some branches 30 feet from the ground,  



Same requirement. Different height.

I found two discarded curtain poles and joined them.

Altogether 127 inches tip-to-tip. About 10.5 feet.

My first blade mount failed as you can see in the video. I failed to
reinforce it and the grain split.

The second mounting is a success. The axis of the saw teeth is parallel to
the axis of the shaft and slightly "above" it. So when the saw rests on the
branch, the blade is vertical.

I prefer a thick blade because the branch can twist and squeeze the blade.
A thinner blade may bend permanently if I push too hard.

I prefer a straight blade so the thrust I exert travels close to the axis.

It is heavy and unwieldy and bends a lot. Sometimes It behaves very like
a fishing pole for deep sea fishing. But I have cut all the branches
I could reach with this. Next involves ladderwork.

If I had some structure nearby I would suspend this pole and ease
the effort. Right now I have to support part of the weight as well
as push-pull.

The centre of gravity is clearly marked if you watch carefully.

Fail:

[youtube]https://youtube.com/shorts/DGpCDmnO-64?feature=share[/youtube]

Success:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/xC1zRStP1oI[/youtube]

2 weeks ago