It is neither a direct nor an exact quote, but a paraphrasing using element from Ancient writings. The various writings in the Christian Bible are translation, as well as borrowing from Ancient writings of other Ancient cultures that still exist during the time of early Christianity. All the religious texts from around the world also record actual events that actually happened: like wars, oral knowledge of locations/technology applications, or natural disaster events that happen during their time or before their time. Just because one is paraphrasing from a religious text to draw attention to these actual events, does not mean they are engaging in religious discussion. Religious texts are written by people who are religious, but they also contain good non-religious information.
If a person belongs to a particular religion, and he made some good points about how to improve agriculture practices in his religious writing; and other people paraphrase what he said to draw attention to good agriculture practices. Are they engaging in religious discussion? Certainly not. No more than if someone has bought an old church building and re-purpose it for other use. Just because they are occupying a church building does not mean they are being religious.
The purpose of my paraphrasing is to draw attention to the fact that there are knowledge & clues from Ancient Time about certain hidden places in this world. Just because I am paraphrasing, does not mean I am engaging in religious discussion. I have made effort to remove any reference to any particular religion, as well as avoid any discussion about God or Deity in my paraphrasing.
I would like someone higher up in the chain of command to review this matter. Thank you in advance for your time in looking into this matter.
