Spanglefeathe Hatfield wrote:
I think security in the future may depend less on climate and more on community.
I believe if we want to thrive in a Peak Oil collapse we ought to start building those relationships and social permaculture NOW.
I would love to start a community on my property. It is also possible we will sell up and live in an RV for awhile. There is still that opportunity in Hoodsport. Being enslaved to a mortgage is a terrible thing. We all ought to wise up and figure out a better way, while we are still free to do so.
A migrating tribe of 12 like- minded people was written into our genes for two million years. Why cant we do it today? Anyone with experience knows twenty reasons why not!!!
I'll put in my own two cents for what it is worth.
Our tribal anchesters lived to the ripe old age of about 35 years old.
Most of the rules were enforced using 'force'.
Many remains found showed signs of blunt trauma.
Our anchestors did'nt fight over oil or natural gas or a 'political idealogy' for the most part, they fought over berry bushes and fishing/hunting grounds.
So, IMHO, our earthy ancestors were not all sunshine and 'I'm ok, your ok.'.
So, when 12 members of one tribe met and there was competition with 12 members of another tribe..there was conflict.
Our species is historically territorial and has not changed alot since we were on the tundra chucking a dart from an atlatl at a bison.
Today we are 'civilized'..we don't use spears or atlatls, we use cruise missiles.
That being said, 'like minded' only goes so far.
The pioneers were 'like minded' when they came across the United States, but only to a point (in most cases) when they got to their destination, they resumed their own lives, beliefs and political systems.
Also 'like minded' can make a community stagnant.
What 'if' a vegan community needs a mechanic?..do they pass up a great mechanic because he/she eats meat?
How about religous views?
Does the community pass up a great construction worker because he/she is non-religous or is religous?
How about politicial view points?
Does a left leaning group pass up a great healer because he/she is right leaning or vice versa?
Or, if the group rejects motor vehicles on the property or even driving them, do they reject a person who is great at alternative energy and electrical engineering because he wants drive his 4WD pickup and Harley?
Where do new ideas come from?
Very simply, a vast array of people from all walks of life or the group becomes stagnant.
Then there is the problem of 'life happens'.
Divorce, change of diet, change of political views, change of careers, loss of a job and income..etc..etc..
Then there is the legal aspects.
If a person has to leave the group because his/her ideals or life goals have changed; does he/she get compensation for work?..materials?..time?
I think the Amish probably have the best system..they are a 'community' but their land is the private property of the family.
The 'bond' is their faith view.
But even then, there can be conflict.
Perhaps the same model could be made based on self reliance, permaculture etc..
The reality is IMHO, 'like minded' only goes so far and people change in life.
And that room for change must not only be made within the 'community', but expected.
The failure of IC's to accept 'different' or even 'change', and not making room for that change, is IMHO, a major reason for the high failure rate of IC's.
Personally, I'm a firm believer that high fences make for good neighbors.
But that is just my own opinion.