Ouch. My comment has been deleted by Paul (presuming here). I'm not sure how to criticize Geoff's recent sales pitch without being culled. I'll offer only this, I do believe there are legitimate reasons to question the efficacy of offering 'the only answer' to global climate change for a fee. It's a bit different from offering 'the only rocket stove'. I'm curious what Joel Salatin or John Liu think about this latest development, Liu, especially, as he's kind of gone from a major promotor to a major salesman, literally overnight. It may not bother him in the least. I honestly don't know. I should have added to the original comment that I do believe that the people who pay for the course will learn a great deal. I wanted to take it. But, now, meh, not so much. If patterns hold out there will be additional sales opportunities as the initial course comes to a close, or perhaps a hierarchy of sorts for levels of monetary contribution. Forgive me, I am very skeptical by nature. I'd love to be proved wrong. If it doesn't happen please, please keep us posted on their absence. Perhaps that would begin to restore some of my lost respect. Good luck, though, to everyone who paid and I do hope I'm wrong. I was getting pretty excited about Geoff and his ideas until, well.., Good studies and good growing!
