Wytze Schouten wrote:
Well folks, I have been experimenting with different configurations inside the fireplace shown in my previous post.
Just as a reminded, the objective is to have a modest rocket mass heater and leave room for a regular touch-the-wood-and-see-the-flames open fireplace.
Attachments to chimney: don't work
To begin with, all attempts at taking the air from the rocket heater's chimney and trying to push it back down through some sort of brick channel... failed. Maybe it was because I piled up the firebricks without sealing the cracks, so the chimney might have been less hot than it would in a final version.
Wytze Schouten wrote:
Plain J-tube setup: works okay
Second batch of attempts, I decided to go with a model where the rocket heater's chimney would simply end after about a meter (3 feet) and let the air go up into the fireplace chimney. That seemed to work a lot better. A simple J-tube in this setup worked fine.
The nice part of this setup, for my purposes, is that you can use the J-tube as the floor for a regular open fireplace. If other experiments (see below) don't work, I could put in three adjacent J-tubes, each with its feed towards the room and its chimney against the fireplace back wall, and have an open fireplace (fireback and all) sit on top of the three horizontal parts.
+ The heat radiation up from the J-tubes would do a lot for the efficiency of the open fire, as a bonus.
- Three J-tubes and an open fire require a lot of air. I would need to channel that from elsewhere. But I should really be doing that already anyway.
Wytze Schouten wrote:
Winding fire tunnel: might work
Finally I found a great example on YouTube of a Finnish rocket mass "floor" heater. Basically, this extends the horizontal part of the J-tube into a small maze before the air goes up the chimney. So long as the chimney is free-standing (i.e. you don't push the exhaust back down into a barrel or anything else), this ought to work.
When I tried this, it sorta worked and sorta didn't. Using the really tiny size burn tunnel in the video was a no-no. That may work in the open air when it's windy, like in the video, but not inside a fireplace in a home. I had to increase the tunnel size to a diameter of 3/4 by 1/2 of a flat brick.
Also, I tried to make the chimney as wide and non-deep as possible (i.e. not square, not round, but rectangular in diameter) to have a maximum surface area to absorb the exhaust heat. Again, reducing any dimension of to below 1/2 flat brick (say, 4 inches) will not give enough draft.
I got stuck at this point for lack of good dry fuel. Also, an alternative for this whole project appeared when a lot of Googling finally led me to the Lorflam and Polyflam systems. Both are French systems which allows you to have a hidden woodstove in a stone mass below a regular open fireplace. That basically solves my dilemma of wanting more firepower without losing the open fireplace's charm.
I may do a little more experimenting with the mass heater concept before the Lorflam or Polyflam is installed (if we can get those French folks to come all the way here to install one). If anyone is interested, just give me a buzz on this forum.
Peter Ellis wrote:Position your hugel bed so it has a south facing slope with good sun exposure and you should be able to get it significantly warmer than a flat bed in the same location. Add a pond (or other reflective body) south of the bed and the reflected sunlight will add to the effect.