Roberto pokachinni wrote: It sounds like you have minimal water needs in comparison to some of your neighbors, but what are your needs/volumes exactly? I'm not asking for my interest, but for yours. You need to figure out what your water needs are, and figure out whether you can supply that from your rain... from your roof catchments.
Roberto pokachinni wrote:
When I lived on Haida Gwaii, in my small off-grid cabin, I lived completely off my food-grade rain barrel that took water off less than half of the roof, a surface well at the garden (used rarely and only for gardening), and saltwater for washing. On that island, there was pretty much year-round rain, in total abundance.
Skandi Rogers wrote:
Not necessarily. what is probably happening is that the amount of water being removed is lessening in the rainy season so the draw down cones are filling in, which would also explain why it never recovers to the same level as before ... What might be an idea especialy if you think the well will run dry is to start thinking about saving for a large buried water tank taken from all your roofs that can supply a much larger proportion of your water needs.
Tyler Ludens wrote:https://www.harvestingrainwater.com/
If every land owner (or even a significant number) implemented these techniques we could solve all our water problems very quickly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iQ-FBAmvBw&t=347s
Travis Johnson wrote:
Aida Alene wrote:I can't seem to find any good resources or books on specifically restoring forests to their natural state after they have been planted with monoculture tree crops. My woodlot is made up of almost entirely Douglas fir (probably some genetically modified version that grows super fast) they are all about 80 years old. I want to do some research into the best way to rectify the situation for the life of the forest and better biodiversity. location: Coastal British Columbia
elevation: 800ft
I am not sure there is any information available unfortunately.
I am on the whole other side of the country so things are far different here, but we have never had good luck with monoculture forests either. Our white pine plantation got White Pine Blister Rust, our Hackmatack got a Bark Beetle infestation, our Spruce got nailed with Spruce Budworm...it is enough to make a landowner cry.
I wish I had more information for you.
I have had great success with circle cutting. That has created a lot of diversity in the stand, as well as allow wildlife to thrive. Now that I really think about it, that has been our best luck so far getting the most diversity back in the stand. Our wild rabbit, deer and moose are really rebounding despite a lot of coyote's here killing them all off. Here is a picture of those circle cutting efforts..
james freyr wrote: I did an internet search and found some books on restoring forests. While some may not appear to be focused on Canadian forests in your area Aida, there may be some useful information within them to help guide you.
Nissa Gadbois wrote:We have had both Icelandic and Shetland sheep.
For ease of handling, Shetland are generally friendlier. They are also quiet substantially smaller than Icelandics, therefore have less meat. Both breeds are primitive and prefer a diet that more closely resembles that of goats (which we also have). Both breeds are good mothers in my experience. Rams are always pretty horrible in tup. Icelandics are also good for milk production, so there is an additional service for you, if you are interested. Both produce valuable wool, though very different. Icelandics produce a double coat - each can be used/sold individually, or blended together. Shetlands produce a very fine wool suitable for things like blankets and outerwear, that sort. Of course, if you don't care to sell the wool it can be used (cleaned) as insulation or as a mulch.