John C Daley wrote:Roger, what is
please?I LOVE IBC Code.
Stacy Witscher wrote:Roger - my understanding is that property taxes are a state matter, and how they are assessed varies. Our property has multiple zones, and we have multiple choices on taxation. While we have only been in Oregon for 1 1/2 years, the assessor has not been out and we would know as our property is gated and not much is visible from the road. In our county at least, code violations are only investigated if private citizens complain, other agencies don't have the right.
In California, certain behaviors trigger a new assessment. It does not happen automatically.
Mark Dominesey wrote:So many places, in particular the homesteading groups on FB, all state that the best place with the least restrictions is rural Missouri. Good growing, 4 seasons, decent land, good prices. I guess that is good enough for some folks. The flip side of unregulated counties is that their services are usually crap, under-resourced fire departments, minimal police assistance for crime, awful roads, etc.
I would suggest places or states with a real enforceable right to farm law. The entire state of Maryland has a great right to farm law. Neighbors cannot do anything about the animal noise or smells, or what we do with the property as long as we follow the very easily found and very easily understood regulations. Your house needs to comply with the IBC, but your farm and animal buildings do not. You only need a zoning permit for ag buildings, to make sure your setbacks are correct, but no building permits are needed or issued. and even a zoning permit is not needed until you hit 600sqft. If you put power in, then you need an electrical permit, same with plumbing, but you can build it any way or how ever you want.
They do want electrical permits if you install solar to your outbuildings and you need a permit for a composting toilet. But all of that is not that harmful compared to the protections you get from jerk neighbors in how you farm or what you farm. We had jerk neighbors on both sides who called animal control daily - who always told them that there is nothing to enforce regarding farm animals. Luckily both jerk neighbors moved.
I hear folks recommending Maine or Vermont or Montana, while nice in practice, I am not sure a 5 month winter is a worthwhile tradeoff for some regulation.
Alec Buchanan wrote:So... how are other permies (legally) catching their rainwater? Or (legally) using off-grid solar? Or (legally) composting humanure? Any natural builders that have gone through the trouble of permitting and regulations? Are people really waiting until they find a place with "no restrictions" before they begin their permie lives?
It seems like it'd cost a fortune for me to do things by the book. I also wouldn't be allowed to have an off-grid solar setup. Building a permittable home, with all its requirements, would be completely impossible without joining the rat race.
Am I the only person here that thinks it is just as important for people to live responsibly (earth care, people care) as it is to follow the rules? I'm not advocating for recklessness or ignorance, but I do think that waiting for laws to catch up with the permaculture world is unrealistic. I doubt permies are going to change the world by following the rulebook, and since there is so much urgency to repair and nurture the planet, shouldn't we reprioritize? I'm not worried about getting a slap on the wrist from an official if it means I get to live the life I am supposed to live. Totally worth it.
Just saying.... I don't think I would have ever become a permie if the motto was "follow the rules".
Also, just saying... you CAN get away with permaculture - just DO IT! There are lots of ways to make it happen, and you don't need a place with no restrictions.
This is planet Earth. Can I get an amen, or am I really that radical? Anyone?
John C Daley wrote:
Remember Tax is the price of a civilised society.
Christopher Westmore wrote:
Roger Klawinski wrote:
Costilla County is literally forcing people to comply or leave.
Worse yet is in many cases it is basically impossible to comply. They are requiring electricity miles away from the grid, it would cost tens of thousands sometimes hundreds of thousands to get it.
They are just clearing out properties.
Stacy Witscher wrote:While I agree, HOA's were definitely on my list of things to avoid. A couple of properties that I viewed had HOA's that were just road maintenance agreements/funding, nothing else. That seemed like a reasonable way to deal with maintaining a private road for multiple properties.
A major issue many people have with HOAs is the way they are structured, many times get hijacked and controlled by a couple of people. The people that gain control of the HOA can impose fines and basically run anyone out they want. HOAs easily become mini tyrant kingdoms where property “owners” have no real rights and no recourse from abuse. The idea and concept is good but the legal structure and what they usually grow into is bad.
I lived in a HOA once, Never Again..
Stacy Witscher wrote:While I agree, HOA's were definitely on my list of things to avoid. A couple of properties that I viewed had HOA's that were just road maintenance agreements/funding, nothing else. That seemed like a reasonable way to deal with maintaining a private road for multiple properties.
Chris Giannini wrote:I would try Maine as a potential state. Very little restrictions as far as what you can build on the land. Vermont is the similar as far as building codes go and you do not need to purchase water rights. VT does require septic though.
Christopher Westmore wrote:
I have also seen places crack down on it. Puna Hawaii and Costilla County, Colorado are a couple of places that attracted a lot of grass roots homesteaders then something changed and they started enforcing stuff. I have also seen small town and neighbor augments turn into code violation reports.
John F Dean wrote:You may want to look real close at any HOA terms. Think in terms of present and future.