For myself I have slowly evolved into believing you need a larger networking project in order to introduce
permaculture principles and other foundational principles of community resilience. I have been working on my own website for a couple of years thought it is still kind of primitive. In that outline I try to make growing food and health the kind of foundational principles though I add a section called local networking which tries to look pretty closely on the aspects of how and why such a focus could work. Part of that is looking at things like alternative currency, but it also deals with the question of internal hierarchies, local regulations and on and on. I have been working with a small group of people here who have the same general interest and one of the things we are coming up against is how to distinguish ourselves and at the same time work wit the master gardeners. There are a lot people we would like to reach within the master gardener program, but there are at least two problems. One is the hierarchy of the MG's and the inability to address the group unless you impress leadership with something. The other part is trying to convince them that there might be a need for a grassroots organization to fill some needs outside of what they are doing in terms of educating and organizing the community in terms of growing food locally. They tend to believe they are already doing everything that can, or
should be done
But the real point is that I think it is difficult to introduce
permaculture and related ideas until you build the desire for a locally networked community on a little broader foundation, and you inspire some feeling that there is a need for a more connected community in general. Hope that is not patronizing or obvious