This has probably been covered, but I could not seem to find the right combination of keywords on the search engine ...
As we've been planning how to arrange things on our
land, the topic of which areas
should be pasture and which should be orchard has come up. Initially, we were thinking of running the orchard in a linear fashion down each side of our road, and separating it from the pasture with fencing. Lately, though, we've begin to wonder (having seen the quality of light and grass in some
local pecan orchards) if it might not be better to scatter the orchard
trees throughout the pasture instead.
As long as we put some fencing around each tree (probably wattle, which we love) to keep the sheep and/or goats off of them, the trees should be protected from girdling. It would seem from what we've seen locally that scattered trees (even if regularly placed on rather a tight grid) allow plenty of light to hit the ground for growing grass/hay or even cereals (the ancient Greeks grew barley underneath their olives). Finally, having a mixture of sun and shade in the pasture would allow our animals more choice as to where to be, which will be of particular importance in the hot Georgia summers.
Thinking about it, we tried to figure out why it's not more commonly done this way, and the only thing we could come up with is that the trees would interfere with mowing or
hay gathering by large machine too much. Sicne that's not likely to be much of an issue for us, it need not really be considered. Are there other major reasons NOT to do things this way?
Thanks,
Doug